Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- From: "gram" <plonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:02:20 -0000
I mean I had to run the translation 3 or 4 times for it to translate
everything, I ran it once and it missed folders and files. second time a few
more and so on.
"Jian-Ping Zhu [MSFT]" <v-jpzhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Pj0jim3UIHA.1172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your reply.
I'm not quite sure about the question. May I know what the 'a few
instances
of ADMT' here means?
To get a better understanding of this issue, please let me know what have
been done in detail when performing a security translation.
Thanks again for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Neo Zhu,
Microsoft Online Support
Microsoft Global Technical Support Center
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- From: Jian-Ping Zhu [MSFT]
- Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- References:
- ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- From: gram
- RE: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- From: Jian-Ping Zhu [MSFT]
- Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- From: gram
- Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- From: Jian-Ping Zhu [MSFT]
- ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- Prev by Date: Re: Issues with new DC
- Next by Date: RE: AD Migration and Outlook access denied.
- Previous by thread: Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- Next by thread: Re: ADMT security command line more robust than gui?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|