RE: First Windows 2003 domain controller
- From: v-morche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Morgan che(MSFT))
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:49:49 GMT
Dear Customer,
Thanks for posing here.
Firstly, after viewing your post, I understand that this issue isn't a
small project, which is associating with AD, SQL and Exchange upgrading.
Here, we mainly focus on break-fix issues related to Windows server
migration. For more effective and guaranteed solution, I would like suggest
you contact our advanced services at:
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/advisoryservice
The Microsoft advanced services provide remotely-delivered and consultative
support option that adds the element of proactive support, and provides a
comprehensive result beyond your break-fix product maintenance needs
However, I am also glad to provide you my analysis and suggestion for your
reference:
Analysis and Suggestion:
==================
1. "When i go to addprep the domain, will that mess with anything? From KB
article (http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=325379) it says to "Scenario 3:
The Windows Server 2003 forestprep command was run without first running
inetOrgPersonFix" do i still need to do that since that messes with
exchange 2000 "stuff" that was left behind?"
[Morgan]:
The propose of running "interOrgPresonFix" to avoid the mangle of three
attributes: houseIdentifier, labeledURI, and secretary. But if our real
environment belongs to one of the following cases, we do not need to run
this command.
o If you run the Windows Server 2003 adprep /forestprep command in a
forest that contains the Windows 2000 schema before you add the Exchange
2000 schema.
o If you install the Exchange 2000 schema in forest that was created
where a Windows Server 2003 domain controller was the first domain
controller in the forest.
o If you add Windows 2000 inetOrgPerson Kit to a forest that contains
the Windows 2000 schema, and then you install Exchange 2000 schema changes,
and then you run the Windows Server 2003 "adprep /forestprep" command.
o If you add Exchange 2000 schema to an existing Windows 2000 forest,
then run Exchange 2003 /forestprep before you run the Windows Server 2003
adprep /forestprep command.
Therefore, it's preferred to consider the upgrade path complying with one
of the above situations.
2. About the issue of Exchange and SQL upgrade, I am sorry that we are not
best support resource for them. The
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration newsgroup mainly focus on the
migration of Windows Server products. To ensure these issues receive full
attention and more professional support, I suggest you opening the new
posts in the below newsgroups:
For the Exchange upgrade:
Microsoft.public.exchange.setup
For the SQL upgrade:
Microsoft.publi.sqlserver.setup
Microsoft.publi.sqlserver.server
3. " Also this is a new domain not an upgrade. Does anyone have any
instructions to follow for such a thing other than the previous KB article
that is for upgrading from windows server 2000 to 2003 but adding a brand
new server?"
Please refer to my colleague David's reply in the below link, which will
provide you a relatively detailed steps about how to add Windows Server
2003 Domain Controller into the Windows Server 2000 domain environment:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/newsgroups/dgbrowser/en-us/defaul
t.mspx?&guid=&sloc=en-us&dg=microsoft.public.windows.server.migration&p=1&ti
d=dc91213c-fbc5-4d1a-b76b-ded87446859b
I hope this helps. If anything is unclear, please feel free to let me know.
Have a nice day!
Sincerely
Morgan Che
Microsoft Online Support
Microsoft Global Technical Support Center
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
--->From: Tesdall <dtesdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--->Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
--->Subject: First Windows 2003 domain controller
--->Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)
--->Organization: http://groups.google.com
--->Lines: 32
--->Message-ID:
<81d3a34a-4a27-42f9-823b-3d0a7aa23aef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--->NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.168.61.73
--->Mime-Version: 1.0
--->Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
--->Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--->X-Trace: posting.google.com 1199493550 3378 127.0.0.1 (5 Jan 2008
00:39:10 GMT)
--->X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
--->NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
--->Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
--->Injection-Info: s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=71.168.61.73;
---> posting-account=8D1pCQoAAAANwLBxMz5GrtnPYlgnfO0F
--->User-Agent: G2/1.0
--->X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
..NET CLR
---> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30;
InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
--->Bytes: 2974
--->X-Original-Bytes: 2931
--->Path:
TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!newsfeed0
0.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca
..giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!s19g2000prg.googlegroups
..com!not-for-mail
--->Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:2752
--->X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
--->
--->We have an IBM AS400 with a netfinity card in it running windows 2000
--->server sp4 that is being replace with a new IBM i5 with a netfinity
--->card running windows 2003 (standard). We will go from 2 (two) domain
--->controllers to 1 (one) and then back up to 2 (two). Removing the as400
--->will take us to 1 Dell powervault server running windows 2000 server
--->sp4. Then when we power up the new i5 we will go back to 2 (two)
--->domain controllers.
--->
--->I have in our primary domain 2 (two) domain controllers, both running
--->windows 2000 server sp4. At once time we purchased back office 2000
--->(for SQL and Exchange 2000) since then back office was removed (SQL
--->and Exchange 2000 from the AS400 netfinity card running windows 2000
--->server sp4) When i go to addprep the domain, will that mess with
--->anything? From KB article (http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=325379)
--->it says to "Scenario 3: The Windows Server 2003 forestprep command was
--->run without first running inetOrgPersonFix" do i still need to do that
--->since that messes with exchange 2000 "stuff" that was left behind?
--->
--->We will be in the next 12 - 16 months been installing Exchange 2007
--->thats why i ask. Also this is a new domain not an upgrade. Does anyone
--->have any instructions to follow for such a thing other than the
--->previous KB article that is for upgrading from windows server 2000 to
--->2003 but adding a brand new server?
--->
--->
--->))))Sorry for the redundency in certain arears i just want to be
--->clear((((
--->
--->
--->This question closely follows this previous post i found.
--->
--->http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
/browse_thread/thread/2ab7155e6abbbd4c/5c8ed66d453092f4?hl=en&lnk=st&q=deplo
ying+first+windows+2003+server+in+a+windows+2000+domain#5c8ed66d453092f4
--->
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: First Windows 2003 domain controller
- From: Tesdall
- Re: First Windows 2003 domain controller
- References:
- First Windows 2003 domain controller
- From: Tesdall
- First Windows 2003 domain controller
- Prev by Date: RE: w2k pdc hardware migration
- Next by Date: RE: SBS 2003 R2 Transition Pack
- Previous by thread: First Windows 2003 domain controller
- Next by thread: Re: First Windows 2003 domain controller
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
