Re: Printer server redundancy
- From: delfincek28@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 4 Nov 2006 10:50:09 -0800
The suggestion to configure clustered printer servers is OK however I
think we'll solve the problem other way. We will add printers to client
computers twice, once from first server, once from second server. When
one print server will be down clients will print to printers configured
from second print server.
Hank Arnold je napisao/la:
That article specifically refers to windows 2003. I can't find an
equivalent one for W2K. Can you post a link? TIA.
Regards,
Hank Arnold
Vincent Xu [MSFT] wrote:
Hi,
I think you'd better to build a cluster for the printer server.
278455 How to Set Up a Clustered Print Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=278455
Hope this helps.
I'll appreciate your understanding that our migration newsgroup mainly
focus on the process of migration resource between domains. For your issue,
I think following newsgroup would be more approprate if you need further
assistance:
microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================
--------------------
14:00:29 GMT)From: delfincek28@xxxxxxxxx
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Subject: Printer server redundancy
Date: 2 Nov 2006 06:00:24 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <1162476024.677033.210510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.191.139.189
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1162476029 4271 127.0.0.1 (2 Nov 2006
rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
posting-host=213.191.139.189;Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
Injection-Info: h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com;
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!msrtrans!nposting-account=3dfJ6A0AAABb056Nb6i3870NLeiiQqe5
Path:
ewsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newshub.sdsu.edu!postnews.google.com!h54g2000cwb
.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:25367Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Here is our situation. We have alot of network printers which were
added to our Windows 2000 print server (SP4) and are shared from there.
Also they are listed in Active Directory. What would be the best way to
establish print server redundancy? For example if our print server
computer is down, I would still like to allow out clients to print to
network printers.
I learned about the Microsoft Print Migrator tool and it works very
well however is there a way to "switch" clients to use another print
server (with exactly the same printers defined) if primary print server
goes down?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Printer server redundancy
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- Re: Printer server redundancy
- References:
- Printer server redundancy
- From: delfincek28
- RE: Printer server redundancy
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- Re: Printer server redundancy
- From: Hank Arnold
- Printer server redundancy
- Prev by Date: Re: Server 2000 adprep /forest prep for 2003 migration
- Next by Date: windows 2003 network design
- Previous by thread: Re: Printer server redundancy
- Next by thread: Re: Printer server redundancy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|