Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: v-xuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Vincent Xu [MSFT])
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:52:57 GMT
Hi Steve,
Greate, let's know the results! I really appreciate that !
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================
--------------------
<stevetretakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Thread-Topic: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
thread-index: AcbGjptpesH/VzGmQiy7HAJB25R5Mg==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 24.161.121.108
From: =?Utf-8?B?c3RldmUgdHJldGFraXM=?=
<JD#7b4AwGHA.5696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>References: <1155575582.439192.178890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1155665466.066504.270880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<2nRjDyNwGHA.5696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<9848B6D4-0A63-409F-AEB2-12B9DD676890@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BVVB1XnxGHA.4548@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:24886Subject: Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:32:02 -0700
Lines: 216
Message-ID: <44D87E1F-1D65-4B5E-B9B0-2525BF22B49C@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
soNNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Thanks for the quick reply, I was just about to test this,. Ill post amy
issues.
steve tretakis
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
Hi,
So far I don't see any issue on 2003&XP clients.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
rights.that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
Windows======================================================
--------------------
<stevetretakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Thread-Topic: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
thread-index: AcbF69ugoFlIlijHSeq9xd+W+ZZsvg==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 65.215.0.150
From: =?Utf-8?B?c3RldmUgdHJldGFraXM=?=
<JD#7b4AwGHA.5696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>References: <1155575582.439192.178890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1155665466.066504.270880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<2nRjDyNwGHA.5696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:24872Subject: Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:07:01 -0700
Lines: 130
Message-ID: <9848B6D4-0A63-409F-AEB2-12B9DD676890@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
If i read that KBID that you posted correctly, that was an early
newsreader2000
issue, is it still an issue with 2003 & xp clients?
steve tretakis
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
Hi,
Yes. :)
Your understanding is correct.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your
<1155665466.066504.270880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>so
rights.that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
======================================================
--------------------
From: "phatgeezer" <LDunham@xxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Subject: Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
Date: 15 Aug 2006 11:11:06 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 56
Message-ID:
<1155575582.439192.178890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>References:
2006<JD#7b4AwGHA.5696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.8.88.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1155665471 28268 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug
5.1;18:11:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:11:11 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT
posting-host=216.8.88.3;SV1;
.NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
Injection-Info: m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com;
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!newsfeed00posting-account=OAMDXg0AAACTQiDCKuCXhZFtIPe6KxgD
Path:
..sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.
giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.
2003com!not-for-mail
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:24803Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Let me see if I understand...If an NT4 PDC is simply upgraded to
exchangewithout preparation, 2000/XP boxes in that domain will notice the
change and new logins will connect with full AD information
towhich could overload the initial DC put in place.
Therefore the NT4Emulator key goes on the PDC before upgrading it
domain2003, so that 2000/XP boxes will still connect to it as an NT
properlyas
a temporary measure until all 2003 DC's are in place.
However, the second 2003 DC in that domain will not promote
NeutralizeNT4Emulatorif
the existing DC is running NT4Emulator, so the
full ADkey is installed on the 2nd DC so that it will participate in
willinformation exchange as it is promoted. In addition, the 2nd DC
required),boxesalso require the NT4Emulator key before promotion so that 2000/XP
will not try to connect to *it* in full AD mode.
Once the 2nd 2003 DC is in place (or however many DCs are
yourdomainthe NT4Emulator is removed from the all DCs, so that full AD
participation can begin by all machines in the domain.
Is that correct?
Vincent Xu [MSFT] wrote:
Hi,
By default, Windows 2000/XP clients use only Windows 2000-based
controllers in a mixed-mode domain. Therefore, if you remove
to addonly
cannotWindows 2003 domain controller, all the Windows 2000/XP clients
log
into the domain.
For the rollback requirement, you may refer to article 284937
NTcontrollersNT4Emulator on Windows NT 4.0 PDC. Then upgrade the domain
2000/XPto
Windows 2003 domain controller. In this situation, a Windows
client
authentication.will no longer receive group policy nor will it do Kerberos
The Windows 2003 domain controller may just work like a Windows
20034.0
intoPDC.
You can roll back the domain without rejoining the workstations
domain.
However, in this situation, if you want to promote a Windows
adddomain
controller to a new Windows 2003 domain controller, you need to
notthe
does notvalue NeutralizeNT4Emulator. Otherwise, since the member server
consider it as a Normal Windows 2003 domain, the promotion may
want towork.
In addition, this procedure is a temporary solution. If you
registryhave a
normal Windows 2003 domain, you should remove the NT4emulator
value on all the Windows 2000/2003 domain controllers.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
.
- References:
- Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: phatgeezer
- RE: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: phatgeezer
- Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: steve tretakis
- Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- From: steve tretakis
- Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- Prev by Date: Re: ADMTv3 Questions
- Next by Date: Re: WIN2K Pro cannot login to domain (In-place upgrade to 2003 R2 from NT4.0)
- Previous by thread: Re: Rollback of failed NT domain upgrade
- Next by thread: RE: Migration from Corrupt AD?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|