RE: Interforest domain restructure



Hi,

I think you can refer to following article:

<http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/a281b8bc-71ea-45b2-b
0ca-8f55257c77301033.mspx>

Hope the information helps.

Best regards,

Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support

======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================



--------------------
Thread-Topic: Interforest domain restructure
thread-index: AcZtmayLjaBkTIhUTeaRcWNASDUj4Q==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 192.146.150.3
From: =?Utf-8?B?U2N1enpp?= <Scuzzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Interforest domain restructure
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 20:37:01 -0700
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <DC4626B1-2101-4095-82F0-2A9DA00309F3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:23528
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration

We are currently Windows Server 2003 AD. For various reasons, including
some
problems with AD schema (we ran a Cisco procedure which wrote
overlapping
entries on our schema - took ages to fix it), phantom and lingering
objects
and Group Policy problems, we have decided to create a pristine Windows
2003
domain in a new forest. I know we can use ADMT to move users, security
groups, SIDs etc. I am concerned that we might "pollute" the new clean
domain
with odds and sods from the old one, which would negate the benefits of
the
migration. Can anyone give me a definitive on exactly what comes over in
the
migration? Will I be able to leave the GP and schema issues behind in the
old
domain - effectively "shedding our skin?"


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: IE7 Cannot view some png images
    ... Vincent Xu ... Microsoft Online Partner Support ... Get Secure! ... When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.setup)
  • Re: IE6 Wont let me See Graphics
    ... Vincent Xu ... Microsoft Online Partner Support ... NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.123.249.122 ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • RE: FSMT Fatal error - Non cluster - Src Win2k SP4 DC to Win2K3 SP
    ... Vincent Xu ... Microsoft Online Partner Support ... Get Secure! ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • RE: Migration from Nt4.0 to Windows 2003 AD
    ... Microsoft Online Partner Support ... Get Secure! ... When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Re: Win2K to Win2003
    ... Microsoft Online Partner Support ... Thanks Vincent for your assistance. ... I have now raised a support ticket with Microsoft to resolve the ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)