Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- From: v-xuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Vincent Xu [MSFT])
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:49:08 GMT
Hi,
>From the Windows 2003 MPS report, I find the DNS Event log is empty. That
indicate, you didn't install DNS server on it. If so, how can you shutdown
Windows 2003 DC?
Please install DNS service on Windows 2003 and test again.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
Business-Critical Phone Support (BCPS) provides you with technical phone
support at no charge during critical LAN outages or "business down"
situations. This benefit is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to all
Microsoft technology partners in the United States and Canada.
This and other support options are available here:
BCPS:
https://partner.microsoft.com/US/technicalsupport/supportoverview/40010469
Others: https://partner.microsoft.com/US/technicalsupport/supportoverview/
If you are outside the United States, please visit our International
Support page: http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>>From: "stoner" <mjstone05@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>Subject: Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
>>Date: 11 Jan 2006 12:17:32 -0800
>>Organization: http://groups.google.com
>>Lines: 19
>>Message-ID: <1137010652.283105.102000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>References: <1136927724.763426.104870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> <PAMAcgnFGHA.3944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.215.81.2
>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>X-Trace: posting.google.com 1137010658 20486 127.0.0.1 (11 Jan 2006
20:17:38 GMT)
>>X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
>>NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
>>In-Reply-To: <PAMAcgnFGHA.3944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>User-Agent: G2/0.2
>>X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>>Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Injection-Info: g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.215.81.2;
>> posting-account=gmdapw0AAAAm0Q8T4B_uriO5xAKrWnvS
>>Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
ne.de!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-fo
r-mail
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:21997
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>
>>I have reviewed steps to take in links, however the problem still isn'
>>t clear. The DN's in the said containers are correct and did not need
>>to be changed. In, "How to troubleshoot file replciation service" I
>>did find the entry for event 13508 interesting when it mentioned RPC's,
>>however the DC's are replicating and the service is running. Worth
>>noting, Exchange 2003 is running on the 2003 DC also. There is only
>>intrasite replication, no inter-site.
>>
>>I have also found a kerberos event ID 4 in SYSTEM log:
>>
>>The kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the
>>server LUGH$. The target name used was NAPLCPD.ORG\LUGH$. This
>>indicates that the password used to encrypt the kerberos service ticket
>>is different than that on the target server. Commonly, this is due to
>>identically named machine accounts in the target realm (NAPLCPD.LOCAL),
>>and the client realm. Please contact your system administrator.
>>
>>This error is in the log quite often. I don't know if this helps any.
>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- From: stoner
- Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- References:
- Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- From: stoner
- Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- From: stoner
- Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: Migrating users from 2000 server to 2003
- Next by Date: RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- Next by thread: Re: Windows 2000 domain upgrade Windows 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|