RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- From: v-xuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Vincent Xu [MSFT])
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:49:14 GMT
Hi,
Regarding your concerns, did you see the users in old domain in the ACL of
the folder on the file server now?
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>>Thread-Topic: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
>>thread-index: AcYW7T5a7RqU9eS6S2SuETZXp67Yzw==
>>X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 65.213.142.100
>>From: "=?Utf-8?B?RGlwdGk=?=" <Dipti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>References: <46AC5DE4-25E3-4A72-93F0-6E50E4F01234@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<UkfE4MZFGHA.3680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
>>Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:26:03 -0800
>>Lines: 100
>>Message-ID: <425B55EE-7765-4E62-974C-79011234F834@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="Utf-8"
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>>Importance: normal
>>Priority: normal
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:21999
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>
>>we will not be needing the source domain after one month. So one month
from
>>today, if I decommission the source domain totally, user permission to
all
>>files and folders in target domain are going to work correctly even if I
do
>>not run computer migration on file server in replace mode-- right? My
boss
>>does not want to run computer migration in replace mode again. He is
afraid
>>if we run in replace mode again, file/folder permission may get messed
up. I
>>am thinking if we do not run computer migration on file server in replace
>>mode and decommission source domain, may be we will see some questionable
sid
>>in security tab which will be associated with source domain and we can
just
>>delete those manually as we come accross these. What do you suggest.
>>Dipti
>>
>>
>>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As you read in the TechNet article, we recommend you run Security
>>> Translation in replace mode to prevent SID history redundancy. If you
no
>>> longer need the old domain, we may suggest you do this. However, if you
>>> don't do this step, also doesn't matter.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Vincent Xu
>>> Microsoft Online Partner Support
>>>
>>> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>>>
>>> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so
>>> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
>>>
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------
>>> >>Thread-Topic: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest
migration
>>> >>thread-index: AcYVWYOpVfUNNAbUQFuewKm8hEKA1w==
>>> >>X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 65.213.142.100
>>> >>From: "=?Utf-8?B?RGlwdGk=?=" <Dipti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>Subject: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
>>> >>Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:16:03 -0800
>>> >>Lines: 32
>>> >>Message-ID: <46AC5DE4-25E3-4A72-93F0-6E50E4F01234@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> >>Content-Type: text/plain;
>>> >> charset="Utf-8"
>>> >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>> >>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>>> >>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>>> >>Importance: normal
>>> >>Priority: normal
>>> >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>>> >>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>> >>NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
>>> >>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
>>> >>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
>>> microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:21954
>>> >>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>> >>
>>> >>Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >>Here is my question regarding decommissioning the old domain.
>>> >>
>>> >>Here is the basic info:
>>> >>
>>> >>We used ADMT V3 to migrate users account, computer account, file
servers.
>>> >>Every thing seems to be working now. We also migrated exchange server
>>> from
>>> >>source to target domain using exchange migration wizard.
>>> >>
>>> >>During the migration I have choose the following options:
>>> >>
>>> >>1) For user migration, I h chose to enable target accounts -- and
disable
>>> >>source account in 60 days.
>>> >>
>>> >>2) For computer migration, I chose to use "Add" mode instead of
>>> "replace"
>>> >>mode.
>>> >>
>>> >>3) We chose to use SID History and Sid filtering.
>>> >>
>>> >>Now that we are almost to the point to decommission our source domain
>>> (old
>>> >>windows 2000 domain), I am wondering what I need to do to accomplish
this
>>> >>without getting into problem after decommissioning old domain.
>>> >>
>>> >>In the documentation for " restructuring active Directory domain
between
>>> >>forestââ?? I believe it is recommended to run computer migration
again in
>>> >>"Replace" mode for the file servers(I need to refresh my memory). Is
this
>>> a
>>> >>necessary step? How do you go about decommissioning old domain for
good.
>>> >>
>>> >>Thanks.
>>> >>--
>>> >>Dipti
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- From: Vincent Xu [MSFT]
- RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- From: Dipti
- RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardware upgrade Windows Server 2003...
- Next by Date: Re: Migrating users from 2000 server to 2003
- Previous by thread: RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- Next by thread: RE: decommissioning the old domain after inter-forest migration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
