RE: Single NT4 Domain to W2K3 AD Structure
- From: v-xuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Vincent Xu [MSFT])
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 06:11:10 GMT
Hi,
Your plan sounds good.
Please also refer to:
<http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/DepK
it/b170bdc5-ba55-4184-8a8f-acb7705ff04a.mspx>
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>>Thread-Topic: Single NT4 Domain to W2K3 AD Structure
>>thread-index: AcX2zFwr2R7E0gA3TYmn2dEn5bIKqQ==
>>X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 80.195.94.102
>>From: "=?Utf-8?B?R2FyeVdyaWdodA==?=" <gwright@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Single NT4 Domain to W2K3 AD Structure
>>Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:10:03 -0800
>>Lines: 31
>>Message-ID: <1BAEE1F4-8C9B-4BFA-AE7A-3681D7F23DDE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="Utf-8"
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>>Importance: normal
>>Priority: normal
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.migration:21542
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
>>
>>Hia,
>>
>>Just wanted to run a question passed anyone who has any comments on this.
>>
>>We are currently running a single Windows NT4 domain, with a PDC and two
>>BDC's, two DHCP/DNS/WINS Servers running Windows 2000, several Windows
2K3
>>member servers and approx 300 Windows 2K Pro workstations.
>>
>>We plan to upgrade to a Windows 2003 active directory this weekend (!),
have
>>managed to schedule a whole two days down-time for the entire LAN (which
is
>>all on the same site).
>>
>>I just wanted to check I was doing everything in the correct order, I
plan
>>on taking one of the DHCP/DNS/WINS servers off-line (the one that runs as
a
>>secondary server), then upgrading the primary one to W2K3. Then, once
>>verified that all is OK, adding a BDC to the domain, syncing it, then
>>removing it. After that, upgrading the PDC to W2K3 and running the AD
wizard.
>>Once done, upgrading the two BDC machines. And last of all, putting the
>>DHCP/DNS/WINS secondary server back on-line and upgrading it to Windows
2K3.
>>
>>Does that sound an OK way to do it?
>>
>>Also, I want to make the 2 x DHCP / DNS / WINS server's domain
controllers,
>>therefor reducing the server requirements by two DC's.
>>
>>Any experts got a view on all the above, sorry about the long winded'ness!
>>
>>Thanks in advance for any comments.
>>
>>--
>>Gary
>>
.
- Prev by Date: RE: NetWare migration
- Next by Date: Applying your personal settings takes too long!
- Previous by thread: RE: strange access denied in ADMT v3
- Next by thread: Applying your personal settings takes too long!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
