Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade
From: Scott Harding (scrockel_at_NO_SPAM_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: braydan_99: "MSDSS Tool"
- Previous message: Neil: "ADMT 2.0 Question"
- In reply to: Frances [MSFT]: "Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade"
- Next in thread: eric z: "Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade"
- Reply: eric z: "Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:38:36 -0700
I wa thinking about that too. Also if you upgraded and a client succesfully
logs into the upgraded domain than your migration is already succesfull.
There would be no need to revert back. You should be fine.
-- Scott Harding MCSE, MCSA, A+, Network+ Microsoft MVP - Windows NT Server "Frances [MSFT]" <v-franhe@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6EWuYscCFHA.2096@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl... > Hello Eric, > > I agree with Scott that the BDC offline is used to backup NT domain in > case > the upgrade is not successful. The issue you mentioned when you rolled > back > to NT domain may be due to the client's OS. What are the clients' OS'? I > assume they are all win2000 or winxp. Is this correct? > > I would like to explain the issue. When you upgrade to Windows 2003 > domain, > all the Windows 2000/XP clients may only authenticate with the new Windows > Server 2003 DC with Kerberos as the authentication protocol. When you took > down the 2003 servers, these work stations would not reuse NTLM protocol > to > authenticate with PDC again. So they cannot log onto the domain. > Down-level > clients do not change the authentication protocols, so they would contact > the PDC and log onto the domain. So if you use a win98, if can still logon > to the NT domain. > > To resolve the problem, you may add NT4Emulator on Windows NT 4.0 PDC > before you upgrade it to win2k3. In this situation, a Windows 2000/XP > client will no longer receive group policy nor will it do Kerberos > authentication. The Windows 2003 domain controller may just work like a > Windows NT 4.0 PDC. You can roll back the domain without rejoining the > workstations into domain. > > The registry key is used to prevent overloading issue addressed in the > article below. > 298713 How to prevent overloading on the first domain controller during > domain > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=298713 > > In addition, you need to make sure clients point to the correct DNS and > WINS server when you roll back. > > As for moving the computer accounts to another domain in batch, you can > refer to the following article to rejoin the clients to the NT domain. > > Resetting computer accounts in Windows 2000 and Window s XP > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/216393/EN-US/ > > Description of Netdom.exe Syntax and Versions > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329721 > > The post titled "Rollback an NT to 2003 upgrade" has addressed a similar > issue. I guess it could be the post you have seen. :) > > Hope this helps. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to get > in touch! > > Best regards, > > Frances He > > > Microsoft Online Partner Support > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security > > ===================================================== > > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so > that others may learn and benefit from your issue. > > ===================================================== > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. >
- Next message: braydan_99: "MSDSS Tool"
- Previous message: Neil: "ADMT 2.0 Question"
- In reply to: Frances [MSFT]: "Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade"
- Next in thread: eric z: "Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade"
- Reply: eric z: "Re: Do I Have To Rejoin WS to Domain If I Rollback to NT Domain After ADS Upgrade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|