Re: NTFS quota vs. FSRM quota
- From: Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:26:25 +0000 (UTC)
Hello Madtom_182,
NTFS is a disk quota, so the added accounts can not use more then the allowed space on the complete disk. With FSRM you can use use folder quotas and differentiate it for your needs.
Also see here for FSRM (expand the + in the left pane):
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755603.aspx
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
In Windows Server 2003 R2, you can put quota on disk which enable a
"by user" quota and you can put quota on folder with File Server
Resource Manager.
On a test server, I enabled both, and it works pretty fine.
But does someone try it on production server?
And, especially, does it impact performance?
Is there any tricks to make it works fine?
.
- References:
- NTFS quota vs. FSRM quota
- From: Madtom_182
- NTFS quota vs. FSRM quota
- Prev by Date: NTFS quota vs. FSRM quota
- Next by Date: Re: Desktop and My Documents Not Connected thru Folder Redirection
- Previous by thread: NTFS quota vs. FSRM quota
- Next by thread: After changed server: Offline files - access denied
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
