Re: XCOPY Insufficient system resources problem.



Hi all,

I've been experiencing the "Insufficient system resources" problem for a
long time, but always used other ways to circunvent it. But now I DO need to
resolve it.

Let me explain it: I work with server virtualization (through Virtual Server
2005 R2 SP1), and it's common for me to have to copy huge VHDs files from one
server to another. But the mentioned problem appears very often, and right
now it's really driving me mad! Next weekend, I'll need to copy this kind of
file fast, due to downtime window.

I think I've tried every listed solution on internet and MS articles, and
none of them helped me:
- Xcopy didn't helped, and neither Rocobopy. Both shows me the same problem.
- Changing IRPStackSize, PagedPoolSize, SystemPages or PoolUsageMaximum
keys helped... with nothing! =P

The solution that I've been using for this problem is copying the file with
NTBackup. It works, but it's a extremelly slow solution, and I can't wait for
so long.

So please, anyone, is there a solution that really works? Or only on Windows
x64 I'll finally see this damn problem resolved?

Our servers are Dell PowerEdge 2800/2900, with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 x86, and
they have, at least, 8Gb RAM. I'm pretty sure that they do have suficient RAM
and free space while performing file copies.

Thanks in advance ;)
Eduardo Nazato


"Ryan" wrote:

Did you ever find a solution to your problem? I'm havnig the same problem now
and don't have a clue what to do next. The best lead I've gotten is this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;304101

This doesn't seem to fix my problem. I'm thinking about further reducing the
PageUsageMaximum to see if it helps on my system. Let me know if you find a
solution.

"Chris Wilhelm" wrote:

After some poking around, I found this article, which isn't really related..
but is, since it's a copying of files problem we have here, not specifically
xcopy, but copy or even copying w/ windows explorer. They all error with the
same message.
The article is this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;304101
and suggests this:
Registry setting 1
1. Click Start, click Run, type regedit in the Open box, and then click OK.
2. Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory
Management
3. On the Edit menu, point to New, and then click DWORD Value.
4. Type PoolUsageMaximum as the entry name, and then press ENTER.
5. Right-click PoolUsageMaximum, and then click Modify.
6. Click Decimal.
7. In the Value data box, type 60, and then click OK.
8. Quit Registry Editor.
9. Restart your computer.

Which indeed has rectified the issue.
"Pegasus (MVP)" wrote:

Seeing that you're talking about principles: Microsoft have decided
that xcopy.exe is superseded by robocopy.exe and that xcopy
should no longer be used, presumably in view of the long-standing
"System resources" problem.

There is another reason why robocopy is preferable (other than
it richer set of switches): It can deal with path+file names in excess
of 255 characters. Xcopy can't.


"Chris Wilhelm" <ChrisWilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:15E24C35-3539-4FF6-B105-4505622DD211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oh I wouldn't. I just want the problem fixed, or some discussion on how
to
fix it. It's not that I can't use robocopy, it's that I shouldn't have
to.
You know.. the principle.

"Pegasus (MVP)" wrote:


"Chris Wilhelm" <Chris Wilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:0753E4DA-D0B0-45A1-BCAB-8618DDFEE832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I also am having this problem when trying to copy files using the
Windows
Explorer. Both systems (target and source) are Windows Server 2003 R2
SP2.

If I try and "push" files at the target, I get this error message:
"Cannot copy <filename>: Insufficient system resources exist to
complete
the
requested service."

If I try and "pull" the files from the source, I get this error
message:
"Cannot copy <filename>: Not enough server storage space is available
to
process this command."

I've searched the knowledgebase for both error messages and found
solutions
to either ancient NT products, some 2000 products, but nothing for
Server
2003.

I'm fairly certain this limitation must still be in effect or have some
bearing on my problem:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833167/en-us

Or less likely, something related to:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/259837/en-us

Other details that might be pertinent:
There is enough disk space on the destination server.
I'm not using VSS in any way, but the service is enabled and runs as it
sees
fit.
Antivirus is disabled on both sides, or enabled, but the messages are
identical.
I can move the files in other ways, such as, backing them up to a
different
media, and restoring that media to the destination.

Why would you use such a tortuous solution if robocopy.exe
does it in one fell swoop?






.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: << SBS news for the week of February 1, 2004>>
    ... > 829358 Overview of the Critical Update for SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine ... > 831747 Overview of the Business Contact Manager for Outlook 2003 Update: ... > 829114 How to remove and how to install the Windows Small Business Server ... > 831664 "The requested media failed to mount" error message when you try to ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)
  • << SBS news for the week of February 1, 2004>>
    ... - Commerce Server 2000 and 2002 ... 831747 Overview of the Business Contact Manager for Outlook 2003 Update: ... 829114 How to remove and how to install the Windows Small Business Server ... 831664 "The requested media failed to mount" error message when you try to ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)
  • Re: XCOPY Insufficient system resources problem.
    ... Windows Sever should do this "alone", ... I work with server virtualization (through Virtual ... Xcopy didn't helped, and neither Rocobopy. ... There is another reason why robocopy is preferable (other than ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • RE: Lsass.exe - when trying to update a password.
    ... Mine is/was a Dell pre-installed windows 2003sbs ... Shortly before this error message, i lost all use of network ... >> Thank you for posting to the SBS Newsgroup. ... >>>connections and the server could not access anyone, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Group policy resultant set of policy
    ... Thank you for posting to the SBS Newsgroup. ... What is the full content of the error message? ... Did you install any updates on your server or client workstations? ... Enable Windows Firewall Domain Profile Allow remote ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)