Re: Folder Shares: question about security
- From: RichGK <RichGK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
On 14 Apr, 15:46, Rob <R...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
When I share a folder, I see two tabs in the properties window: Sharing and
Security. In the Sharing tab, there's the Permissions button that allows me
to add users to access this shared folder, and then in the Security tab it
allows me to do the same with more granular options.
What is the difference between these two security models? If I were to
simply grant a user in the same domain to access a shared folder, which of
these two options should I use. On a side note, what if the user belongs to
another (but trusted) domain, would it still be possible for that user to
access the share?
Thank you.
Common (best) practice is to set Share Permissions for Everyone to
full control and then use NTFS security to provide the restrictive
access you require.
If using a FAT drive you only have access to share permissions, in
this case you need to know the limitations (of which there are
plenty).
If mixing share permissions and NTFS security (which is not a good
idea if only because you don't need to) then the share permissions
will be the most restrictive.
.
- References:
- Folder Shares: question about security
- From: Rob
- Folder Shares: question about security
- Prev by Date: Folder Shares: question about security
- Next by Date: Best practice for local folder security
- Previous by thread: Folder Shares: question about security
- Next by thread: Best practice for local folder security
- Index(es):