Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: "Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" <EdwinvMierlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:34:55 -0000
is
Right, but we are only using hotswap SCSI and SAS, drives all mounted in
hotswap trays. So electrical disconnect is not the issue. Moreover the
Symantec commands I mentioned would let you power off a disk device that
*not* hotswappable.
No, it just prepares the drivers from Symantec for device removal, this
might or might not be OK for hot-swapping. The Symantec drivers are
upperlayered drivers in the storage IO stack, and not disk device class
drivers, you still need a hot-swap functionality in your class driver.
Symantec are probably a "volume" device drivers, not a "disk" device
drivers.
a
2) ensure your software (e.g. drivers) supports "hot-swap"
No, I think you are missing the point. Veritas / Symantec implemented
low level
actually there are not that low level at all, depending if you are used
looking at storage stacks, and what angle you approach this stack.
driver that flushes all information to the disk,
only partly true, it flushes to the filesystem and volume, which ultimately
ends up on a disk, but disk is a different device then a volume device.
prepares it for
power off,
I would like to see that claim being backed up with some documentation
please ?
and then stops the OS from writing anything else to it from the
point that the disk is "detached".
not disk, you mean volume
The very nice thing about that is itOS
allows you to power off even drives that are NOT hot swappable while the
runs hot.
Nice claim, any documentation about this... now you use the term "drives",
with that do you mean disks or do you mean volumes, as "drives" to me is a
mounted "NTFS volume" represented by a "letter", and to be honest it would
be better not to use the term "drives".
Of course reacquiring a device later that is not designed for
hot reconnection might or might not work and would be hit and miss.
Certainly it works beautifully with SCSI and SAS.
I think you are messing up your teminology big time, and confusing what the
driver stack looks like.
It could be that you are right, and in that case I am really interested to
see the documentation on that, and will stand corrected.
For now, I am signing off
Rgds,
Edwin.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Will
- Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Will
- Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Will
- Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Edwin vMierlo [MVP]
- Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- From: Will
- Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- Prev by Date: Re: Question Folder Structure Best Practices
- Next by Date: RE: Removable Storage Trouble
- Previous by thread: Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- Next by thread: Re: Command To Allow Safe Removal of Hard Drive?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|