Re: disk partitioning best practice



Of course it is relevent. Take for instance my setup. I have a DELL server
with a dual channel RAID controller. On one channel I have 2x36GB SCSI HDD
RAID1(Mirror) with only my OS (C: drive) installed on it. My other channel I
have 7x73GB SCSI HDD RAID 5 with one hot spare. No if my OS drives go out
I'm still online because of my mirrored set. If both go out (hardly likely)
then all I need to recover is my OS C: drive because my D: drive is totally
seperate. And visa versa. Id my D: drive crashes (again hardly likely
because of my RAID 5 Array and my hot spare) then my system is still up and
running and I can restore my data and still be online.
With just a single drive if it goes bad all goes bad. Single or multiple
partitions.

"P R Quasi" <quasi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1a1675c9-eb44-4be7-8d5c-e208b4febb32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
let us say you have just one large disk

probably it sits on a raid but the operating sytsems see it as one
disk to be partitioned however

how would total size affect you decision? and scsi or sata is that
relevant to partition choice?

On 5 Dec, 23:14, "SmallBizW2K3User" <small...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some many tangiables involved when deciding how to partition. RAID
Controller? Single or Dual? total disks and sizes? SATA? SCSI?

"P R Quasi" <qu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:e5ca6084-8692-45f6-8c4c-7c95e01ce226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

hello

what do you recommend to be best practice for partitioning disks?

some say split into a C: for your system files and D: for you data

others like to put everything on C:

some like more complicated partition schemes with more seperate
partitions for page file or user settings

what do you think?

if so, what sizes are good for now and for the future?

all one partition sounds easiest but is there a drawbacks?

thank you



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Replacing a raid 5 controller with different card
    ... at least for the part not depending on S-ATA or the RAID ... drives present to the OS at the bios level. ... raid controller and you make an array based on the number of drives ... In the operating system you make partitions. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Migrating to Raid
    ... RAID would do... ... It is unclear whether you want to migrate the two existing 200GB drives into ... I note you do not have shared partitions for /home /usr etc. in your ... server - and a cheap box for that would cost less than your RAID card! ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Installing Exchange for performance
    ... > Not sure what you mean by 4 pairs of mirrored RAID drives... ... > mirroring offers better performance because of sequential writes. ... >> needs partitions for the SMTP queues, ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: New install of SBS and where to put SQL and exchange
    ... Both raid arrays are physically different, ... SBS is one busy machine, exchange and sql, are ... Partitions are good for organizing data and splitting things up to make data ... drives with a multi-channel RAID controller? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Mover SQL server
    ... expansion of C my recommendation is to (providing this is hardware Raid) ... expand the partitions on Imaging. ... repartition (or possibly replace the hard drives with a bigger ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)

Quantcast