Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- From: markm75 <markm75c@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:08:52 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 1, 7:05 pm, Leythos <v...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <e48f7f98-dffc-4b1d-acee-
1e316c071...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, markm...@xxxxxxx says...
How does all this change if i look to virtualize each role.. i'm
leaning more towards virtualizing each role.
A database, unless you want to kill performance, needs a proper drive
setup.
I do have one mirror for the OS.. the data was on raid5.. for
virtualization.. i figured i'd create another mirror.. if i had 5
virutal servers running.. i'd run 3 on the raid 5 and 2 on the mirror
set...
In terms of databases and VS.. what is typically done here.. is it ok
to have a sql server inside a virtual machine.. also.. on the virtual
servers.. is it typically setup the way a real server would be.. ie:
c drive for OS.. another D for data.. then an E say for logs.. or does
this even matter in the virtual sense..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- From: markm75
- Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- From: Leythos
- Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- From: markm75
- Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- From: Leythos
- Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- Prev by Date: compairing folders
- Next by Date: Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- Next by thread: Re: Cpu speed and core recommendations for this 2003 server? Virtualization of parts ?
- Index(es):
Loading