Re: Share Permissions vs NTFS Permissions
- From: "Pegasus" <I.can@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:32:57 +0200
"Jon" <Jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DC311C60-378B-403E-9F04-EBBDA55AEEC3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I'm struggling to understand permissions in W2k3 server standard. I have
shared a folder, 'Documents', and set the share permission for my user
group
to Read only. On a sub-folder within 'Documents' I want my user group to
have
full control so have set the folder's security permissions appropriately.
However, members of the user group are denied access.
Which set of permissions take precedence? Should I avoid share permissions
altogether or set them in a particular way?
Apologies if this has been answered before - haven't been able to find the
answer.
Thanks, Jon
You should set the Share permissions to "Full access" for everyone,
then tune the NTFS permissions to meet your specific requirements.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Share Permissions vs NTFS Permissions
- From: Herb Martin
- Re: Share Permissions vs NTFS Permissions
- Prev by Date: Re: XP Clients require password to connect to shared printers on 2003 Server
- Next by Date: Re: Share Permissions vs NTFS Permissions
- Previous by thread: Re: Enable Write Disk Caching not saving (Server 2003)
- Next by thread: Re: Share Permissions vs NTFS Permissions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|