Re: 2003 Enteprise SP2 or 2003 Enteprise R2
- From: "neo [mvp outlook]" <neo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:46:40 -0700
No for compatibility/performance. Basically Windows 2003 R2 is Windows 2003
SP1 w/ a bonus pack of features (some of which you can download and some
not).
"gocrm" <gocrm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7E2050D6-52F2-4527-A5A1-9D3CE77494C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Greetings,
This question is related to Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 Enterprise. But
since it is relevant to the OS, I am posting it here.
I am running Windows 2003 Enterprise SP2 on the host server. On the
virtual
instances, I installed several Windows 2003 Enterprise R2 VHD. I am
thinking of upgrading my HOST server to Window 2003 Enterprise R2. I
thought
this would keep my host and the more VMs syncronized. My quetions are:
1) If I don't upgrade and leave the host with the Windows 2003 , will this
cause a compatibility issue since the host is R2 and the VMs are not?
2) Will I gain any real benefit by upgrading the host to R2? Will it
give
me any better performance?
I read the comparision between the R2 and the Enterprise SP2 version and
it
only have the few diffences. The differences were mostly Active Directory
and File Syncronization.
I really don't want to upgrade because it's a real pain to reload 264
servers. I am just wondering if there's a real reason to upgrade or not
upgrade. Thanks for your help.
--
Regards,
Andy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2003 Enteprise SP2 or 2003 Enteprise R2
- From: Danny Sanders
- Re: 2003 Enteprise SP2 or 2003 Enteprise R2
- Prev by Date: Re: Cannot join domain
- Next by Date: Re: can't logon win2k3 local administrator
- Previous by thread: Server Cannot boot - Hangs after detecting array controller
- Next by thread: Re: 2003 Enteprise SP2 or 2003 Enteprise R2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|