Re: Backup for Servers
- From: "Alan Roy" <a.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:16:21 -0000
I've never understood why so many people are disparaging about the inbuilt
MS Backup, I've always found it to be really easy to use and reliable. I use
it to do a full back up once a week, and an incremental one overnight to a
NAS
"pestocat" <gel114@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eh6n5%23RYHHA.944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What is the typical means to provide backup for a server. OS will be
WinServer 2003 standard. This will be for a small office environment and
maybe 30 maximum tractions per day. I would suggest incremental backups at
noon and end of the day and full backup once a week. I assume tape backup
is the choice, but what are other choices. I see in server specs they have
multiple hard-drives available. What are the pros/cons. Comments are
welcome.
Thank you
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Backup for Servers
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Backup for Servers
- References:
- Backup for Servers
- From: pestocat
- Backup for Servers
- Prev by Date: Re: Vista printing to W2K3 server shared printer
- Next by Date: Re: Approx Salary for UK IT Role
- Previous by thread: Re: Backup for Servers
- Next by thread: Re: Backup for Servers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|