Re: RAID1
- From: "Matt Cortner" <mcortner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:35:47 -0500
Thanks for the advice!
Matt
"Hank Arnold" <rasilon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ueASYFCnGHA.4692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree 10,000%!!!
When I started supporting the Hospice I work at, the "expert" consultant
they had added 2 drives to an existing server and decided to create a
software RAID array. Not really knowing what it meant at the time, I said
"sure.". 1 1/2 years later one drive failed and (you guessed it) the
entire array was unrecoverable (at least by these idiots). Fortunately, we
*did* have a tape backup. Unfortunately, it was a slow, piece of crap tape
backup system (since replaced with a new one) and we spent about 10 hours
re-building and restoring the data.
Spend the money and get hardware RAID. Forget software RAID......
Regards,
Hank Arnold
John Harris wrote:
Think very carefully about not wanting to spend the money. I am
currently assisting a client with software RAID where one disk has
physically failed. He now cannot boot the server at all and he has 5
years of programming data that he cannot access. worse still, his backup
has not been working for over a year but he has been changing the tapes
every day!
Hardware RAID would not suffer this problem unless the controller itself
failed (very rare)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID1
- From: Hank Arnold
- Re: RAID1
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows 2003 Server
- Next by Date: Re: Admin of servers, laptops, etc. on remote networks
- Previous by thread: SNMP configuration
- Next by thread: Re: RAID1
- Index(es):