Re: Blade standarts - which is the best for me?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance




Robert Moir napisal(a):

Blades are just an interesting way to collect small form factor servers
together.

Look for a vendor who commits to supporting their blade chassis for some
time, and allows mixing and matching of blade models in one chassis, e.g. so
that you don't need a new chassis every time they upgrade the blades.

Yes, this is a good point, but i'm not sure if sometimes complete
revolution is better that just keeping an old standard... Question is
if this is possible that we can use such chassises for long time while
increasing all the time our standards (our needs are still growing...)
HP for example is starting selling new chassises which are not
compatible with previous type, but they are in my opinion much
better... The point is, we have limited space for our cabinets, and we
really need to thing how can we decrease size of our machines (db,
exchg, ts, proxy and many others).

Think about decent racking space, power provisioning and cooling - in a
fully loaded blade you're pushing a lot of power into the chassis and will
need to remove a lot of heat. Neither of those happens well without some
thought.

This is not a thing i'm afraid of - i have perfect cooling systems ;-)

Disk storage is obviously impacted with blades due to the limited space, in
fact you can't meet my personal standard requirements for an exchange back
end server or SQL server on a blade without involving a SAN also...

Yes, this is true, but we wanted to start without SAN. What are we
thinking about is to use something like Net App Filer solution, where
assigning disks is very flexible.

--
Tomasz

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blade standarts - which is the best for me?
    ... chassis, e.g. so that you don't need a new chassis every time they ... revolution is better that just keeping an old standard... ... I'm simply saying that you need to be sure your blade chassis is ... Yes, this is true, but we wanted to start without SAN. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • RE: question.. not sure where to post..!!
    ... The blade servers a separate server. ... The shared chassis has a built in KVM and Gig switch. ... normal SCSI drives, the model we looked at used IDE laptop drives. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Suse 10 problems - SSH
    ... guys rock! ... blade center chassis upon which the server resides. ... some of the blades and started tracing it back to the chassis. ... I do not know how the xord corruption came about. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: DHCP, boot server race?
    ... are networked via paths that are integral to the chassis backplane. ... XPe blade server -> a general purpose blade computer on which we will ... We are using PXE and we do have DHCP as supported by the "switch/DHCP ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
  • Re: 64 chassis and 72 Body compatible?
    ... I have a good '64 chassis and a friend has a '72 Body that we'd ... the body is not a Super Beetle. ... Are there major differences between ... A super and standard are not compatible without major surgery. ...
    (rec.autos.makers.vw.aircooled)