Re: Hardware configuration SATA vs. SCSI
- From: "Dave Patrick" <DSPatrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:09:16 -0600
I don't think raid 5 is generally recommended for SQL Server but better to
ask them here.
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.sqlserver.server&cat=en_US_671e06d0-f20d-4bb3-9c6a-42c825ddb1dc&lang=en&cr=US
--
Regards,
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"TurboTom" wrote:
| We are going to have Windows Server 2003 running desktop SQL with about 10
| users.
| Will there be a noticeable speed difference between 5 SATA 3Gb/s versus 4
| SCSI drives in a raid 5 configuration?
| I'm sure if I look at the numbers, SCSI will look much faster, but in
actual
| use, how would it appear?
|
| Thanks,
| Tom
|
.
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the best software to have multible boot Win 2000 server, Win 2003 server ?
- Next by Date: Re: Dual boot system installation problem.
- Previous by thread: Changing the computer name of a promoted domain server (Win2K3)
- Next by thread: Re: Hardware configuration SATA vs. SCSI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading