Re: Hardware Recommendations

Since I seem to be asking the wrong questions to get the answers that I am
looking for, I would like to provide the list of roles again with the rank of
the 2 components in the order of importance.

1. AD Domain Controller (RAM, CPU)
2. Services-DNS, DHCP (RAM, CPU)
3. File & Print (RAM, CPU)
4. Exchange (RAM/CPU equally important)
5. SQL (CPU, RAM)
6. SMS (?)
7. Applications (RAM/CPU equally important)
8. IIS (RAM, CPU)
9. Apache (RAM, CPU)
10. Oracle (CPU, RAM)

Please provided feedback regarding these two components only, and whether I
am correct in my assesment in the order of importance of these two components.

"Jason Meyer" wrote:

> Well you are right in SQL being CPU/RAM intensive, but also is very IO
> intensive, as is Exchange(both depending on how much and type of usage
> which you didn't explain). You may want to read up on deployment of
> those two to see what your needs are and what you can afford to use for
> your disk subsystems. IIS, load up on RAM and get some good CPUS, for
> disk, the faster the reading the better. Your Domain Controllers should
> have good cpus, and a good amount of RAM, disks...just make sure you
> mirror them.
>
> Jason
>
> Richard Perry wrote:
> > As I said in my original email, I already have about 27 servers, so new
> > server purchases are not in the equation.
> >
> > Second, I am not asking for specific input regarding my scenario or
> > hardware. I am asking in general what the most important components are for
> > say an IIS server. My understanding is that in IIS, RAM is the most important
> > component. SQL is equally CPU and RAM intense. DNS and DHCP are RAM I believe.
> >
> > Can someone please confirm this? I need to know the hardware impact for each
> > server role.
> >
> > "Justin Rich" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Get a Blade Server :)
> >>you can adjust CPU's, memory, and diskspace for each virtual server.. i have
> >>a buddy that works on a very large system with those and LOVES them... if
> >>not... a couple of entry level servers will do fine for most of that.. you
> >>didnt really tell us the usage... so its hard to say what to buy.. i can run
> >>SQL on my desktop machine and server up a handful or users no problem..
> >>
> >>really we need to know where you are with usage and where you plan to be in
> >>the next 3 years..
> >>
> >>"Richard Perry" <RichardPerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>news:28F814EC-EDF6-41C5-A756-33F1C29333B9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>>I am preparing a plan to perform a Novell Netware to Windows 2003 Active
> >>>Directory migration. We currently have about 27 servers of various
> >>>hardware
> >>>specifications.
> >>>
> >>>As I see it, the server roles in the future configuration will be as
> >>>follows:
> >>>1. AD Domain Controllers and Services (DNS, DHCP)
> >>>2. File & Print
> >>>3. Exchange
> >>>4. SQL (2005?)
> >>>5. SMS
> >>>6. Applications
> >>>7. IIS
> >>>8. Apache (Blackboard Learning System)
> >>>9. Oracle database and application
> >>>
> >>>I am looking for a general recommendation for each role about the most
> >>>important aspect of the server configuration. There is a SAN involved with
> >>>about 1TB of disk space, and will be dedicated to mostly F&P, SQL, and
> >>>IIS.
> >>>Most servers will have at least 2 hard drives.
> >>>
> >>>My main concern here is based on each role, what component is most
> >>>critical.
> >>>SQL is very CPU and RAM intense, IIS is more RAM intense, etc.
> >>>
> >>>Can anyone offer insight as to what component(s) are most critical to a
> >>>server involved in each role?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Terminal Sessions performance
    ... After reviewing everything you have written in this thread thus far, it would appear that you do not have enough RAM for the number of users and applications on your server. ... In this post you state that the PF Usage number reaches over 3GB. ... One of the ways you can tell when you have too little RAM is if you see high Pages/sec in Performance Monitor combined with slow performance and high CPU. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • EX2003 nutzt Hardware nicht aus
    ... 100MBit-Netz) und der Exchange-Server war nicht der schnellste. ... CPU: Dual-XEON-3-GHz ... RAM: 4 GB ... Client oder Server ist ausgelastet und trozdem ist Outlook extrem ...
    (microsoft.public.de.exchange)
  • Re: Reducing load for LAMP app?
    ... as much as possible, he keeps query results in RAM, but ... try to make sure that the server is overloaded ... It may be I/O bound due to low RAM and too many disk access, process bound - too many processes for the RAM avaialable - or simply CPU bound having to do too much computation. ...
    (comp.lang.php)
  • Re: High Amount of memory
    ... low of a number IIS crashes or freezes...nice fix. ... 12, 37, and 139 mb of RAM. ... If you're not already at Windows Server SP2, I'd either install that or get ... the fix below to see if that solves the w3wp part of the issue. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Would a 2nd processor really be a waste of time???? help
    ... > buy another processor and more ram, however this is what one supplier ... > Your server has only 1 processor. ... installation including changing the bios settings and installing the smp ... The second cpu will probably help ...somewhat. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)