Re: DHCP address leases
- From: "wosully" <wosully@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:06:02 -0800
There may be another DHCP server on the network: your DHCP server would not
take the addresses it has in a scope for clients if it is using a static
address. I have only seen this happen when someone else had a DHCP server on
the network.
--
MCSE: Security, CCNA, A+, Network +, Security+
"robsco" wrote:
> Sorry there is a misunderstanding.
>
> The server has one NIC card with a static address.
> I have set up a pool of DHCP addresses for the local users.
> When the server is restarted for some reason the server takes the pool of
> addresses even though IP is set to static and assigned DHCP is disabled.
> The problem this causes is that the local users have no spare addresses to
> be assigned to them.
>
> "steveharper" wrote:
>
> >
> > Assuming by "localhost" you are refering to the DHCP server. Why do you
> > need to have 10 static addresses on the server? A DHCP server can't
> > have a dynamic address anyway. So, set it to like 192.168.65.200 or
> > something.
> > Not really sure what it is you are asking for here, but I would remove
> > those static addresses from the server, and configure all workstations
> > to use DHCP. In the DHCP server release the addresses that are "in use"
> > and then renew addresses on the workstations.
> >
> > robsco wrote:
> > > *I am running server 2003 with a DHCP pool of 192.168.*.201 -
> > > 192.168.*.210
> > > across our network of 65 sites, where * is the site number.
> > > On one of our sites the DHCP scope address leases are taken up by
> > > the
> > > localhost, but the localhost IP address is set as static and not
> > > dhcp
> > > assigned.
> > >
> > > Help would be grateful. *
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > steveharper
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Posted via http://www.mcse.ms
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > View this thread: http://www.mcse.ms/message2040683.html
> >
> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DHCP address leases
- From: robsco
- Re: DHCP address leases
- References:
- Re: DHCP address leases
- From: steveharper
- Re: DHCP address leases
- Prev by Date: Re: reboot
- Next by Date: Re: group policy
- Previous by thread: Re: DHCP address leases
- Next by thread: Re: DHCP address leases
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|