Re: Which Server to pick

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

Is that true of both standard and premium, or just standard. I am curious
because my premimum says it is available (though I have not had need to
activate it).

"chrispsg" wrote:

> Small Business Server does not run TS.
>
> psg
>
> read this link.....
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/evaluation/features/default.mspx
> scroll all the way to the bottom....
>
> psg
>
> "BobS" <BobS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:A2A20254-1500-4C83-A7F6-18C20FDDAD1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Thanks chrispsg:
> >
> > Where does SBS 2003 fit into all of this for purposes of Terminal Services
> >
> > Thanks again
> >
> > "chrispsg" wrote:
> >
> >> There is a good table comparing them all in the link below..
> >>
> >> http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winserver2003_editions.asp
> >>
> >> psg
> >>
> >> "BobS" <BobS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:75E9EB88-F589-4649-B660-76DA6AEA8871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >I have been looking for someplace that will give me a good comparison of
> >> > Windows Server 2003 and Small Business Server 2003 so I can determine
> >> > why
> >> > they are priced the way they are, and which to pick for a client.
> >> >
> >> > It seems odd to me that Server 2003 would cost 200-300 more than SBS
> >> > 2003
> >> > given the exchange functionality of SBS and all. Is this just a
> >> > marketing
> >> > thing or are there other things to consider.
> >> >
> >> > I have a client that wants to set up several (3 - 5) very small servers
> >> > for
> >> > terminal services with remote offices. The way his proprietary
> >> > software
> >> > is,
> >> > each office must have its own computer named "OfficeMainxx" (the xx to
> >> > make
> >> > them unique). So each server will only have 2 - 5 computers logging in
> >> > remotely in Application Mode. There is really no other functionality
> >> > needed.
> >> >
> >> > Looking at all of the costs involved (the OS, TS CALs, etc), is the SBS
> >> > just
> >> > as up to the job as Server 2003, and is there another option that might
> >> > be
> >> > even better.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the NON-technical help.
> >> >
> >> > Bob Showalter, Packer International
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
.