RE: COM+ catalog error ?
- From: "Dave" <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:10:06 -0800
Hi,
I hope I understood correctly, I logged on to another server and added the
bad machine. But based on the permissions I saw, it appears I was actually
looking at local permissions, not permissions from the remote bad server.
The reason I think they were the local permissions was because IIS from that
local server was listed under launch.
Anyway, the permissions were correct as you had listed.
Did I miss something?
"Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your swift reply!
>
> Based on my further research, the issue could be caused by that the DCOM
> permissions are incorrect in your system that is the reason you are not
> able to modify them locally due to the dcomcnfg utility failing to open the
> properties of "My Computer". To order to resolve the issue, I would like to
> suggest you attempt to perform the following steps:
>
> 1. On another Windows 2003 server open the dcomcnfg utility.
>
> 2. Expand "Component Services" and then "Computers".
>
> 3. Right click on "Computers" and select "New" then "Computer".
>
> 4. In the "Browse" box type in the name of the computer to be modified and
> click "OK".
>
> 5. Click on the "COM Security tab.
>
> 6. In the "Access Permissions" click the "Edit Default..." button and add
> or remove entries until you have only:
>
> SELF with Allow Local Access and Remote Access.
> SYSTEM with Allow Local Access only.
>
> 7. In the "Launch and Activation Permissions" click "Edit Default..." and
> add or remove entries until you have only:
>
> ADMINISTRATORS (Local System\Administrators) with Allow: Local Launch,
> Remote Launch, Local Activation and Remote Activation.
> INTERACTIVE with Allow: Local Launch, Remote Launch, Local Activation and
> Remote Activation
> SYSTEM with Allow: Local Launch, Remote Launch, Local Activation and
> Remote Activation.
>
> Note: There may be some specialized third party applications that require
> an account be included but there should never be any unknown accounts or
> SIDs included.
>
> 8. Click "OK" until you have exited the dcomcnfg utility.
>
> And then reboot the windows 2003 server.
>
> Hope the information helps.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jason Tan
>
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>
> =====================================================
>
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
>
> =====================================================
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------
> | Thread-Topic: COM+ catalog error ?
> | thread-index: AcXbD+oYcOWPSH56TduqyQfS5gauAQ==
> | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 161.11.130.8
> | From: "=?Utf-8?B?RGF2ZQ==?=" <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | References: <F50B33E3-5821-41D1-952D-32340C609EDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <d9EPETh2FHA.3936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <7BFD0044-AD60-4DB7-80C0-64FD6F9B2ED6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mXsdylp2FHA.3220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Subject: RE: COM+ catalog error ?
> | Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:03:04 -0700
> | Lines: 182
> | Message-ID: <36AC7661-6B49-42AA-A8AE-1A309B8026D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | charset="Utf-8"
> | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | Importance: normal
> | Priority: normal
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.general
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.general:51635
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.general
> |
> | Thanks for the correction, alas it didn't resolve the issue.
> | I tried the reinstall of sp1 but that didn't resolve it either.
> |
> | Any other suggestions?
> |
> | "Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
> |
> | > Hello,
> | >
> | > Sorry for for my wrong input. You may reregister ole32.dll and
> | > oleaut32.dll, two different DLL files. Please run the following two
> | > commands.
> | >
> | > Regsvr32 ole32.dll
> | > Regsvr32 oleaut32.dll
> | >
> | > Best Regards,
> | >
> | > Jason Tan
> | >
> | > Microsoft Online Partner Support
> | > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> | >
> | > =====================================================
> | >
> | > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
> so
> | > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> | >
> | > =====================================================
> | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> | >
> | >
> | > --------------------
> | > | Thread-Topic: COM+ catalog error ?
> | > | thread-index: AcXaYdmHI8otHQ+lTwW/owgFzukeSw==
> | > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 161.11.130.8
> | > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?RGF2ZQ==?=" <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | References: <F50B33E3-5821-41D1-952D-32340C609EDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > <d9EPETh2FHA.3936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | Subject: RE: COM+ catalog error ?
> | > | Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:17:04 -0700
> | > | Lines: 108
> | > | Message-ID: <7BFD0044-AD60-4DB7-80C0-64FD6F9B2ED6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | > | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | > | charset="Utf-8"
> | > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | > | Importance: normal
> | > | Priority: normal
> | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.general
> | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
> microsoft.public.windows.server.general:51507
> | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.general
> | > |
> | > | Jason,
> | > |
> | > | Thanks for your response, could I just confirm that your first
> suggestion
> | > is
> | > | to issue the same command twice ? "regsvr32 ole32.dll" ???
> | > |
> | > | Thanks
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | "Jason Tan (MSFT)" wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > Hello,
> | > | >
> | > | > Thanks for posting!
> | > | >
> | > | > For your post, when clicking COM+Application, you get PopUp Message
> | > "The
> | > | > server catalog version is not supported. The catalog is either
> newer or
> | > | > older than this application and a common version for communication
> does
> | > not
> | > | > exist". If I have misunderstood your concerns, please feel free to
> let
> | > me
> | > | > know.
> | > | >
> | > | > Based on my research, I would like to provide you with the
> following
> | > | > suggestions.
> | > | >
> | > | > Suggestion 1: Reregister ole32.dll and ole32.dll
> | > | > ------------------
> | > | >
> | > | > Click Start, Run
> | > | >
> | > | > Regsvr32 ole32.dll
> | > | > Regsvr32 ole32.dll
> | > | >
> | > | > If the issue persists, please go to next section.
> | > | >
> | > | > Suggestion 2: Reinstall Window Server 2003 Service Pack 1.
> | > | > ---------------------
> | > | >
> | > | > Please remove the Service Pack 1 and reinstall it.
> | > | >
> | > | > Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (32 bit)
> | > | >
> | >
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=22CFC239-337C-4D81-
> | > | > 8354-72593B1C1F43&displaylang=en
> | > | >
> | > | > Hope the information helps. If there is anything that is unclear,
> | > please
> | > | > feel free to let me know.
> | > | >
> | > | > Best Regards,
> | > | >
> | > | > Jason Tan
> | > | >
> | > | > Microsoft Online Partner Support
> | > | > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> | > | >
> | > | > =====================================================
> | > | >
> | > | > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your
> newsreader
> | > so
> | > | > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> | > | >
> | > | > =====================================================
> | > | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> | > rights.
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > --------------------
> | > | > | Thread-Topic: COM+ catalog error ?
> | > | > | thread-index: AcXZmn+pAbi2HCSoRO28Wlu3b6IFCg==
> | > | > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 161.11.130.8
> | > | > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?RGF2ZQ==?=" <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | > | Subject: COM+ catalog error ?
> | > | > | Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:30:04 -0700
> | > | > | Lines: 12
> | > | > | Message-ID: <F50B33E3-5821-41D1-952D-32340C609EDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | > | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | > | > | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | > | > | charset="Utf-8"
> | > | > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | > | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | > | > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | > | > | Importance: normal
> | > | > | Priority: normal
> | > | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | > | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.general
> | > | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | > | > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | > | > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
> | > microsoft.public.windows.server.general:51385
> | > | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.general
> | > | > |
> | > | > | I'm not sure....if I open the Component Services MMC and go down
> the
> | > tree
> | > | > to
> | > | > | click on "COM+ Applications" - I get a popup "Catalog Error" "The
> | > server
> | > | > | catalog version is not supported. The catalog is either newer or
> | > older
> | > | > than
> | > | > | this application and a common version for communication does not
> | > exist"
> | > | > |
> | > | > | Any thoughts ?
> | > | > |
> | > | > | This is a Windows Server 2003 sp1 machine.
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
>
>
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Command Line Commands
- Next by Date: Re: moving from Eval to full licensed
- Previous by thread: Re: Command Line Commands
- Next by thread: Re: moving from Eval to full licensed
- Index(es):