Re: RAID 0/RAID 5???



My 2c worth.

Are you sure that he didn't mean RAID1?
RAID0 has zero redundancy, so if one disc fails, you lose EVERYTHING!
RAID1 is a set or identically mirrorer disks, so if one fails, the other can carry on working as usual. The read and write speeds usually equal the speed of a single disk.


I'd go for RAID5 as it offers great redundancy (although you can only lose 1 disk), but you have the added advantage of multiple disk heads reading and writing data to and from the array, therefore throughput is usually greater.

A useful website that explains RAID configurations can be found here:
http://www.raid.com/04_01_00.html

Hope this helps.

Kirsten wrote:
Hi.
I bought two brand new HP/Compaq ML370 servers with 4 SCSI disks each and a
Smart Array Controller (hardware for raid capabilities).

With my old servers I had RAID 5 with a similar configuration so I was going
to configure the new servers with the same mechanism, but the Compaq agent
that installed the new computers told me to use RAID 0 because it is safe
enough and save lots of CPU+hardware resources.

The obvious fact is that RAID 5 is SAFER than RAID 0, but now I'm a little
bit confused by this guy's suggestion.
So, what do you suggest? Each server will hold an instance of SQL Server and
IIS Server.

Thanks in advance,
Kirsten


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to verify/fix High Disk Read Latencies in Exch2003 ?
    ... Exchange production servers are, the SAN is an EMC CX600. ... >>> current log file on disk and continues until data in the log buffers ... Comingling occurs whe two or more LUNs reside ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: 2003 Enteprise SP2 or 2003 Enteprise R2
    ... If you run setup from disk 2 of the R2 set it will install this: ... SP 2 on *all* Win 2k3 servers. ... SP 2 is an OS upgrade that should be ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: LVM Documentation
    ... what were you trying to do with your disk? ... DiskSuite isn't really intended to do quite as much as HP-UX LVM. ... that mirroring the boot drives should be done in hardware, ... where there was not yet any functional network and the servers had no ...
    (comp.sys.hp.hpux)
  • Re: New to NAS, have idea, looking for software to do it.
    ... Some servers are virtual hosts - just ... of free disk space on the local disk drives. ... It seems like a waste to have all that free storage on workstations ... That means that you need significant redundancy in your raid setup, and are likely to spend a great deal of time doing re-builds. ...
    (comp.arch.storage)
  • Re: HBA connection
    ... In Windows Server 2003 Cluster server has a switch that when enabled, ... cluster-managed disk. ... > We bought new IBM Blade servers and putting in production> soon. ... I have a basic question about the clustering> servers, many places Microsoft recommended OS and Shared> Disk should be connected in different SCSI cards. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)

Loading