Re: Domain Controller
- From: "McCall, Iain" <iain.mccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:38:33 +0100
Hi,
That's the gist of how it works, but if I remember correctly, in Windows
2000 native, if the DC that was down was a GC, a user logging on would need
to obtain Universal Group Membership from a GC before they are authorised to
logon. If there was no GC left in the domain to contact, this might be why
your user was unable to logon.
I believe this was refined in Windows 2003, whereby a DC would cache
Universal Group Membership if enabled so if a GC was down, a user could
obtain a current cached listing from the DC and mitigate the requirement of
contacting a GC.
If you domain is single, might be worth making both DC's GC's.
Iain
"mo_d" <mod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5123734F-4A36-4A15-B9BA-93D165805F49@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I have a 2000 domain with 2 DC's and 100 xp clients. What deteremines their
> logon server? I was wondering because some users cannot logon when one of
> them is down. I thought that if one of the DC's was down then they would
> simply logon to the other one. Is this correct?
.
- References:
- Domain Controller
- From: mo_d
- Domain Controller
- Prev by Date: Re: Help, MS tech support is useless
- Next by Date: Re: User Migration [WILDPACKET]
- Previous by thread: Re: Domain Controller
- Next by thread: Re: Domain Controller
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|