Re: Defragmenting local drives on servers
- From: "Frankster" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 07:29:31 -0600
Built in defrag is fine. Don't get carried away. I only do mine about once
every 6 months to a year. Defrag is highly overrated by many, IMHO.
Although good at times (when the system tells you your drive is fragmented
enough to make it worthwhile), there is no point in running it excessively.
And, there is always a risk when running any defrag util.
-Frank
"joe0874" <joe0874@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:29F999A1-6680-4476-A6FA-F008672BA796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unfortunately, we have not had a policy in place for general server
> maintenance such as defragmentation. As such, many of the servers report
> that
> the local drives are severely fragmented.
>
> My question is, would it be worthwhile to use the built in defragmenter,
> or
> would using a 3rd party tool (DiskKeeper?) be easier?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defragmenting local drives on servers
- From: joe0874
- Re: Defragmenting local drives on servers
- References:
- Defragmenting local drives on servers
- From: joe0874
- Defragmenting local drives on servers
- Prev by Date: Re: disable network printer auto searching in XP
- Next by Date: Has anyone tried running SMS 2003 on SBS 2003 Premium?
- Previous by thread: Defragmenting local drives on servers
- Next by thread: Re: Defragmenting local drives on servers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|