Re: Dual Boot (follly)
- From: "Vince" <Vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:34:10 -0700
Thanks for the putdown, Just have a few computers at home and have been
learning about how to use them. Maybe 10 months. My kids are using computers
in school so I guess a big train wreck is starting. Maybe if I had started in
1985, i would be as smart as you? but then again, what does boiling water
have to do with computers:) I appreciate your imput, but not your sarcastic
remarks.
"Slip Kid" wrote:
> Vince,
>
> My advice was labled a "duplication of effort".
>
> Where have you been since?
>
> Yes, the silence is deafening. It's been me you and Pegasus!
>
> Did you go back and read the first response from Arec? He was on the
> mark and needed only include a few other bits of advice. But he'd set
> you on a sound path and any question beyond that would easily been
> answered (by Arec).
>
> Methinks Arec can get a dualboot in, in record time. He sure scattered!
>
> In over a decade of installing more dual-boots than I can count, (for
> myself, clients and friends) I don't recall ever spending more than an
> afternoon, at the longest? Hell, with small drives (half a gig) I made
> it work with 2 OS's having to share he same partition/volume. (No, I
> never walked miles to return a book as did Mr. Lincoln).
>
> Yes, your circumstances requried advance preparation - maybe an hour or
> two at best. Vince, this was a no-brainer!
>
> Here we are on the tenth and your initial post was made on the 7th. I
> dare say had you gone to the MS site (rarely my sole choice for advice)
> and one or two other sites which have been dealing with this now common
> practice for years...Well, Vince? I'll bet you'd have been up and
> running that evening.
>
> Yes, as "unnecessary" as much of my advice was (it did concern more than
> a strict reply to the narrow subject a hand)? Even if you you'd have
> done *all* I advised, line by line - - this would be over. Ignore my
> further advice for now? You may revisit my tips when you recover from
> this.
>
> Funny thing? If you never visited this group? If you only did a Google
> search for "dual boot" (or Dual-boot or dualboot)?
>
> Vince, the book was writen years ago! In fact, now most of the results
> refer to a Linux install.
>
> You have to scroll down a page of results to find an MS only queston.
> Yeah, sometimes around the turn of the century a dual boot became
> "traditional". If only you would have looked at ten sites you would
> probably have found 95% agreement between 90% of them. In fact, some of
> the early "Flagship sites" are gone! They don't have anything new to
> offer.
>
> I hope your new buddy lives a long time. I suspect he'll be at your
> beckoned call more than once in the future. Amazing how silent this
> group is. I sincerly doubt anyone who has installed more than a hanfull
> of dualboots can believe how this has turned out to be a few day project.
>
> At which point do we use the word *fiasco*?
>
> Has anybody here who had done this more than once spent more than a day
> with it? An evening?
>
> Yeah, I haven't used a machine without a dual boot in over a dozen
> years. Each upgrade or any modification to a box, drive or OS was
> within that config. I don't know if I haven't used a third party boot
> manager out there. Why have I always returned to boot.ini? It isn't
> that I didn't 'try' and experiment with a diffeent method!
>
> You are not dumb! But few of the questions or problems you present fall
> into the *complicated* catagory. Let others conclude why this has become
> "complicated".
>
> If my suggestion was so *wrong", I wonder why it is largely still the
> boilerplate various MS suggestions and appears at most any site you
> would choose at random. (Execpt if you were installing a Linux OS).
>
> Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill! Viince, sometimes "A
> cigar is just a cigar."
>
> I suppose this will be fixed, if it already isn't? I hope your method
> guarantees it is *over*. I can give you more than a few reasons why you
> will revist this scene (if not this group).
>
> I've never been so proud to be insulted! I watch you run into one
> unnecessary brick wall after another and fight the urge to be smug
> knowing not only should this be behind you but I have litle confidence
> you did anything but set yourself on a path which will require you to
> pose more than a few questions as long as you rely upon this solution.
>
> Good Luck Vince! You have undertaken one of the simplest technical
> proceedures. In the face of the preponderence of evidence of "how most
> people" satisfy your need - you chose the fork in the road.
>
> I'd like to see the response in this group to the queston: "How do I
> boil water?"
>
> [Answer]
>
> "Well, first you have do dig a well...."
>
> Sez I? "Wait, he has water coming out of the tap!" (But that would be
> too simple!)
>
> Yes, Pegasus is going to ignore me! (As will the legions who may fear
> his repudiation?)
>
> I guess there is a new and better (but also held in confidence) way of
> installing a second MS OS!
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual Boot (follly)
- From: Slip Kid
- Re: Dual Boot (follly)
- References:
- Dual Boot
- From: Vince
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Slip Kid
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Slip Kid
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Slip Kid
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Vince
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Vince
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Vince
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Vince
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Dual Boot
- From: Vince
- Re: Dual Boot (follly)
- From: Slip Kid
- Dual Boot
- Prev by Date: Riprep Image
- Next by Date: NT4 serveur error 21a when starting...
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual Boot (follly)
- Next by thread: Re: Dual Boot (follly)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|