Re: Port forwarding
- From: "Joseph Byrns" <JosephByrns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 08:11:18 +0100
All of the above was true, but I have just managed to fix it. I had
inadvertantly removed the default gateway setting (poiting to the router)
for the w2k3 machine. Whoops!!
Thanks for all the help.
"Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uBswBIqUFHA.2468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Let's look at this systematically. Here is what I assume:
>
> - The internal IP address of Server1 is 192.168.1.1.
> - The internal IP address of Server2 is 192.168.1.2.
> - The internal IP address of PC1 is 192.168.1.101.
> - Both servers run the Terminal Server service.
> - The RDP port number of Server1 is set to 3391.
> - The RDP port number of Server2 is set to 3392.
> - You type this command on a PC1
> telnet 192.168.1.1 3391
> You get a response.
> - You type this command on a PC1
> telnet 192.168.1.2 3392
> You get a response.
> - Your router is set so that it forwards packets for port 3391 to
> 192.168.1.1.
> - Your router is set so that it forwards packets for port 3392 to
> 192.168.1.2.
> - Your external IP address is aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd.
> - You type this command on an external PC:
> telnet aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 3391
> You get no response.
> - You type this command on an external PC:
> telnet aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 3392
> You get a response.
>
> If all of the above are true (after making the appropriate adjustments
> to the IP addresses) then you have a problem with your router.
> Here is what I would do:
> - Examine its log.
> - Put on a sniffer.
> - Try another router.
>
> "Joseph Byrns" <JosephByrns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23ME5L1kUFHA.612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Thanks for the reply, but unfortunately still no luck, I tried the higher
>> port as suggested but it still didn't work, if I try a telnet to a port
>> pointing to a different server then it works fine (but there is
>> definately
>> no firewall set up on the w2k3 server). I also checked with the ISP to
> make
>> sure they weren't blocking any ports, they apparently only block port 25.
>> Everything still works from within the LAN.
>>
>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> "Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:u0RVhmkUFHA.3716@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Rather than testing port 80, I suggest you test a port
>> > with a higher number, e.g. 3389 (RDP). Many ISPs
>> > block ports below 1024.
>> >
>> > Use telnet.exe to test your ports. It is far easier and
>> > versatile to use then IIS6.
>> >
>> > Many ADSL routers have an inbuilt logger. Check its
>> > entries both for a successful and a failed test.
>> >
>> >
>> > "Joseph Byrns" <JosephByrns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:%237M2NdkUFHA.444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > - What port numbers are you talking about?
>> >> Port 80
>> >>
>> >> > - How do you test port forwarding?
>> >> Trying to access a web page provided by IIS6
>> >>
>> >> > - What happens when you perform the test from inside
>> >> > your network rather than through the router?
>> >> It works fine.
>> >>
>> >> > - If you disconnect the server from the network and
>> >> > connect it via a cross-over cable to a laptop, then
>> >> > access the server port under test from the laptop,
>> >> > what does your network adapter status panel show?
>> >> > Any incoming traffic?
>> >> I've not tried this, but I'd rather not disconnect the server until
> I've
>> >> exhausted all other avenues.
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas appreciated.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Port forwarding
- From: Joseph Byrns
- Re: Port forwarding
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Port forwarding
- From: Joseph Byrns
- Re: Port forwarding
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Port forwarding
- From: Joseph Byrns
- Re: Port forwarding
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Port forwarding
- Prev by Date: Re: rename server
- Next by Date: Re: Windows 2003 Service Pack 1 and Windows 3.11/95
- Previous by thread: Re: Port forwarding
- Next by thread: Server reporting wrong amount of disk space used?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|