RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- From: "Troy Bruder" <troy_bruder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 21:31:24 -0400
I'm trying to understand a little more about the RAID configuration options
we're evauluating..
One option we have available is Raid 1+0:
1+0 = Raid 10 = Striping over mirror sets... With (4) 72.4 GB disks, this
type of configuration will yield 145 GB of usable disk.......
A Raid 5 config, will yield 217 GB..... I'm wondering if RAID 5 will yield
FASTER performance with only 4 disks... Follow me here...knowing we have
four disks to work with:
In a RAID 5 config, data will be written across 3 disks, then parity
computed and written to a fourth drive..
In a 1+0 config, data will be striped across two disks, then mirrored across
two more disks.
Think about a 10 Meg file written to these arrays... In a raid 5 config,
3.3 GB would be written to each of the 3 disks, then parity info to the 4th,
right??? In the 1+0 config, the system has to write 5 GB to each disk, then
mirror it... More data is written PER DISK?
Am I way off course here??? I'm not very familiar with Raid technologies
other than the 0, 1, and 5 standards...
Thanks,
Troy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- From: Charles
- Re: RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- From: Bill Totten via WinServerKB.com
- Re: RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- From: Chris M
- RE: RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- From: MNCoughlin
- RE: RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- Prev by Date: Re: flushing AD authentication credentials
- Next by Date: Re: RRAS & ICF Error
- Previous by thread: Error getting samples from external NTP source
- Next by thread: RE: RAID 1+0 vs. 5 performance HELP!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading