Re: Is This Even Practical?

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



Something else you could consider - replicate the documents between the two
sites so you have local copies. I have trialled the following software and
found it to be very good, they specifically target CAD environments:
www.availl.com

A T1 isn't really going to make opening documents from the other side of the
WAN link happen within acceptable times.

"Sam Manzella" <sjmanzella@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23jrihbFQFHA.2748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for the replies. Currently, at out main office we have a Full T1,
> but at our branch office we have a Business Class Cable Solution, which if
> I remember correctly has a 2.2Mbps download (non guaranteed though), and a
> 768Kbps upload.
>
> The branch office currently opens some Excel files (not very complex) over
> the current VPN configuration (Firewall-to-Firewall), and it's a little
> too slow to make it a full-blown "production-type" connection.
>
> The idea for the T1 point-to-point plan would allow our users to open
> AutoCAD (.DWG) files across the network. Our AutoCAD files use External
> Reference files, meaning when you open 1 file, you'll be referencing from
> 1 to maybe even 10 different drawings. The drawings vary in size, but the
> largest file to be opened would probably be no more than 4MB (as a
> combined size) or somewhere around that.
>
> A direct connection to Exchange would be the other major item. The branch
> office currently downloads messages via POP3 from our main office.
>
> I suppose the use of Roaming Profiles would probably not be recommended in
> this situation.
>
> Well, gee.... The only way I can sell this to my boss is if I convince him
> that we can get rid of our Server there (it's due for an upgrade), plus I
> wanted to centralize Backups, and enjoy all the other little perks that
> come with a dedicated connection...
>
> Not sure. I'm getting mixed feelings from you guys, but my understanding
> so far is that it will work, but may not be the best performing solution,
> correct?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> "Nestor" <Nestor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:CD35A49B-861C-4A08-A0C4-1C51AE817FA0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Practical, yes. But are you saying you would install a T1 in addition to
>> whatever bandwidth they are currently using? In my opinion that would
>> waste
>> money and not make the best use of your current bandwidth.
>>
>> I think the solution to provide direct connectivity between sites is to
>> leverage their existing bandwidth (I don't think you mentioned what their
>> current capacity is) and create a VPN between both sites, either using a
>> software VPN (like from Symantec
>> or use the VPN capability within Windows) or hardware like on a router.
>>
>> Here's some good links on VPN's:
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/intwork/inbe_vpn_koku.asp
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/intwork/inbe_vpn_ydqh.asp
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/smbiz/sitsol/RmtMngmt_9.mspx
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> "Sam Manzella" wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We currently have two locations (different cities). Each location has a
>>> Server, Domain, Firewall, Router, ISP etc. The second location is
>>> made-up of
>>> only 10 Users, and the main location is about 40.
>>>
>>> We're thinking of having a dedicated Point to Point T1 connection
>>> between
>>> the offices to share files, and maybe even Voice. Would it be practical
>>> in
>>> our case for them (location 2, 10 users) to work completely work off our
>>> Network?
>>>
>>> Basically, the idea would be to remove their local domain/server and
>>> have
>>> them Logon, Open and Save files over the T1, and connect directly to our
>>> Exchange server.
>>>
>>> We currently have a VPN configured, but it's very slow so we don't
>>> really
>>> use it much other than transferring some small data files.
>>>
>>> If anyone has ever done this via a full T1, please let me know if this
>>> would
>>> be a good option.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is This Even Practical?
    ... The branch office currently opens some Excel files over ... the current VPN configuration, ... A direct connection to Exchange would be the other major item. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • FS BNIB Draktek High Performance 2930 Router (50 meg VM compatible)
    ... and BoD (Bandwidth on Demand); it also features advanced bandwidth control ... It allows users to access Internet and combine the bandwidth of the dual WAN ... Without the necessity of installing VPN client on individual PC, ... The two dedicated ethernet WAN ports can provide load balancing, ...
    (uk.adverts.computer)
  • FS: Draytek 2930 Router BNIB
    ... and BoD (Bandwidth on Demand); it also features advanced bandwidth control ... It allows users to access Internet and combine the bandwidth of the dual WAN ... Without the necessity of installing VPN client on individual PC, ... The two dedicated ethernet WAN ports can provide load balancing, ...
    (uk.adverts.computer)
  • Re: cisco805 bandwith limit
    ... vpn and internet. ... problem is that users from branch office "over-utilise" their internet ... (email and file / print often eat a lot more bandwidth than you expect). ... Note - any kind of policing or rate limiting is going to hit router perf (i ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: VoIP Latency Problem? [Telecom]
    ... We currently have a very simple VPN from our US office to our remote ...  Our bandwidth is fine, but our latency is running around 280 ... latency appear to be running at their usual baseline. ... Please put [Telecom] at the end of your subject line, ...
    (comp.dcom.telecom)