Re: File Compression (native NTFS) - help settle an argument

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] (lanwench_at_heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com)
Date: 12/17/04


Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:15:44 -0500

Davie Robertson wrote:
> Thanks Troy (and Lanwench).
>
> However I don't agree with you both.

OK, so try it and see. My advice is not a direct order - it's just based on
my experience and research. I think you'll find you take a performance hit
if do this.

>
> We've got about 18,000 users and about 100 departments. Each Dept.
> has it's own share for people to exchange (and archive) the odd
> report, PowerPoint, spreadsheet, etc (within the dept.). I know all
> about sharepoint etc (but I have to win each battle at a time).
>
> There are no application datastores on these shares, just office
> files that might get accessed up to 10 times a day. I cannot believe
> we should just (continue) to invest in more storage when we're not
> getting full use of the technology already in place - in this case
> NTFS compression.

I advise against this, but then, I already said that.
>
> Further, with the introduction of XML based files formats the wastage
> of HD space will increase over time. There must be a point where it
> is more efficient to transfer xMb from a HD and uncompress it in
> memory before transferring it (x times 2) across the Lan than to load
> xMb direct from the HD.
>
> It's also worth pointing out that the cost of physical storage has a
> very impact on the cost to the end user in a large enterprise - most
> IT dept. charge based on the cost of managing the capacity - of which
> the capital cost is a small %
>
> I guess I'm too 'old school' :)
>
>
> "troy" wrote:
>
>> You would be better served to you purchase more disk space. The use
>> of compresed files is going to be slower. Disk Space is cheap, time
>> to upgrade :)



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Upgrading to Photoshop Elements 6.0
    ... I decided to install PSE 6. ... trashed the version 4 application / folder in the Applications folder, ... If disk space is becoming a problem I suggest getting an external hard ... and it cost me $800.00. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.apps)
  • Re: MS Announces Vista System requirements, but theres a catch....
    ... Vista would therefore consume about $20.00 worth of disk space. ... It's nothing to do with the cost of disk space but all to do with ... amounts of memory and disk space are now available does NOT mean the ... MF applications seem much more concise that do the ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: PCI Express support for 2.4 kernel
    ... this initialization with 0 cost nothing. ... Try it with an older version of gcc, which most people are still using ... is allocated and zeroed at run time, no disk space is required. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: File Compression (native NTFS) - help settle an argument
    ... efficient to transfer xMb from a HD and uncompress it in memory before ... transferring it across the Lan than to load xMb direct from the ... It's also worth pointing out that the cost of physical storage has a very ... Disk Space is cheap, time to upgrade ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)