Re: Ghosting clients
From: GMA257 (GMA257_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: Okotok: "Can't see folders after crash"
- Previous message: Tel: "Re: Sound"
- In reply to: GMA257: "Re: Ghosting clients"
- Next in thread: Mark-Allen Perry: "Re: Ghosting clients"
- Reply: Mark-Allen Perry: "Re: Ghosting clients"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:09:05 -0800
I checked the server and also found that the network cards were set to auto.
I changed both the internet and intranet card configuration but still no go.
"GMA257" wrote:
> That was an excelent point that was posted just as I was starting an incedent
> with Microsoft Tech Support so I called off the incedent knowing that I
> hadn't configured the card for anything and knowing that Auto mode does
> indeed assume some of the worse settings. Anyway I configured the card for
> full duplex 100Mb in the protocol.ini file, rebooted the client, and that
> didn't seem to help. The W2K3 server has the defaults in it for network
> connectivity so I'm not for certain that it is also full duplex 100Mb. I'll
> have to check that tonight but I'm not certain that it could be an issue on
> the server side because the same network connection between the server and
> the ethernet switch is shared between this DOS client and the other Windows
> clients which are showing no network throughput problems. Unless the card
> reconfigures itself between seperate packets of information depending on
> which client is do the packet transmission.?
>
> "Mark-Allen Perry" wrote:
>
> > Are the network settings under DOS set to the same as under WinZZZZZ?
> >
> > Meaning: network speed, duplex settings, etc.
> >
> > And are the network settings under DOS (IP address, mask, DNS, etc.) the same also?
> >
> > I have seen the DOS settings go to either half-duplex or 'Auto' and then the network is hosed if you try to push it since the routing can't handle the difference between the two boxes.
> >
> > Just a thought.
> >
> > --
> > Always try the MS KB first before posting.
> > MS KB: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;EN-US;KBHOWTO
> > And the answer could have already been posted, so try searching this and other newsgroups first.
> > ----
> > Mark-Allen Perry
> > ALPHA Systems
> > Marly, Switzerland
> > mark-allen_AT_mvps_DOT_org
> >
> > "GMA257" <GMA257@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0733489B-4989-485C-A9F4-71B7F1A94744@microsoft.com...
> > I have everything in place to begin ghosting except fast network throughput
> > from the DOS machine to the W2K3 server. If I copy any file from the DOS
> > machine to the server it is painfully slow (45 seconds for 1.4Mb). However
> > if I copy a file from the server to the DOS machine all is as it should be.
> > I can reboot the DOS machine into Win95 or WinXP go to a DOS prompt and copy
> > works just fine both directions.
> >
> > I have followed article 263088:
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;263088
> > then I followed article 321098:
> > http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=321098
> > I have determined from article 270926:
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/270926
> > That I am dealing with the Raw Mode data copy method.
> >
> > Using network monitor I'm not entirely convinced that I'm not having the
> > problem discussed in article 810382:
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810382
> > because the TCP Window size does get above the 8192 figure that was set in
> > the above earlier article. I did not see an entry in the registry for
> > SynAttackProtect so I did not create one with a value of 0 or 1 the article
> > mearly stated that if the values was 2 to change it to 0 or 1.
> >
> > I have found that Ping can not be used to determine speed or to generate the
> > needed traffic to determine TCP window size. In DOS, ping reports <50ms for
> > a reply whether I'm pinging 127.0.0.1 or the server. The server however
> > claims to ping the client in <1ms.
> >
> > I'm using NDIS 2 drivers on the client for a SIS900 network card. The boot
> > disk was created by Norton Ghost. I have also used "Bart's Network Boot
> > Disk" with no better luck.
> > --
> > G-ANDERSON
- Next message: Okotok: "Can't see folders after crash"
- Previous message: Tel: "Re: Sound"
- In reply to: GMA257: "Re: Ghosting clients"
- Next in thread: Mark-Allen Perry: "Re: Ghosting clients"
- Reply: Mark-Allen Perry: "Re: Ghosting clients"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|