Removing Connection Agreement
Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:54:20 -0700
Hi,
I've Exchange 2003 on a W2K3 box. Is it necessary to have a connection
agreement for W2K3 to E2K3 in ADC? I cannot seem to be able to remove
it. I guess it is to ensure new users are also created in Exchange?
Regards,
Norman
Relevant Pages
- Re: Basic NT4 to w2k3 migration questions
... > read other threads written by otehrs who followed advice similar to your ... Our Exchange mail goes to a Linux mail ... >>> new hardware and then upgrading it to w2k3 which sounds a bit idiotic to ... This includes a Windows 2003 Exchance server. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.migration) - Re: ADC Install? Where? Multiple 5.5 sites
... ADC is designed to help join the Exchange 5.5 and AD ... let's the 5.5 server and Exchange server talk to each other and share ... You would then insert a E2K3 ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.setup) - Re: GC does not know group membership of users
... yes I have a mixed w2k and w2k3 ... moved the FSMO roles from the w2k to this w2k3 and demoted later on ... This is starting to sound like an Exchange and an AD design/installation ... you run setup /domainprep in the forest root domain mycompany.com? ...
(microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory) - Re: GC does not know group membership of users
... made the forest root DC a GC but moved the IM role to the other DC so ... the Exchange Domain Servers group, but only in the child-domain where they ... yes I have a mixed w2k and w2k3 ... moved the FSMO roles from the w2k to this w2k3 and demoted later on ...
(microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory) - E2k3 coexistence with Exch 5.5
... I have a exchange 5.5 multi site environment. ... One of the sites will now be migrated to e2k3. ... can I just set up ADC between the site that I will migrate ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity) |
|
