RE: Windows 2003 log off very slow

From: Erik Szewczyk [MVP] (ErikSzewczykMVP_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/07/04 

Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:33:01 -0700

My guess would be we're looking at something 3rd party related. Maybe a
device driver or 3rd party addon.

Are these servers all running (esentially) the same hardware? Are there any
additional software packages or management utilities that have been installed
on all of them?

-Erik

"Gareth" wrote:

> I have installed this and there is not progress
>
> "Kristian Vidal" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Get a util from Microsoft called UPHClean, it helps with
> > user log offs, reducing time and profile corruptions. It
> > just installs as a service and runs in the background.
> > I've used it at two sites and it works like a dream. It
> > will also run on 2000.
> >
> > Cheers
> > K
> >

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Last Update - Anyone else having issues getitng root hints?
    ... I have to DNS servers for our hosting environment. ... After the DNS patch neither DNS server will get root hints and thus ... Both a vanilla installs with the exception of no dynamic updates, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)
  • Re: Linux vs MS Security
    ... >> systems compared to Microsoft? ... > installs a compromised piece of software. ... It used to be normal to let servers run as root. ... this applies to windows as well. ...
    (comp.os.linux)
  • Re: Network interfaces refusing to start on boot: F10
    ... I personally install as many as 20 Linux systems a week, on all kinds of hardware, for both home and business users, as well as servers. ... Many of those are 'lab' installs, ... And since I am the 'support' person these folks turn to, ... Besides that issue, F10, in particular, has been rock solid on all systems installed and tested so far, including a monster server utilized as a master VM. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Win 2003 SP1
    ... I've installed on 4 different 2003 servers. ... The three non-DC servers aren't in the same domain as the ... > Has anyone successfully installed SP1? ... > Basically, any Happy installs, and HORROR installs. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: [RH bug number] Re: ruby in the government - 1.6.x -> 1.8.x woes
    ... Then just repeat that on the servers where you need 1.8. ... RPMs, debs or whatever). ... I'd be concerned about running into problems where your ruby installs have differing modules because the development files were missing when you built ruby. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)