Re: Terminal Services question
From: Todd J Heron (todd_heron_no_spam_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/02/04
- Next message: Tom Sawyer: "AD Restore on new Server Installation"
- Previous message: Todd J Heron: "Re: Windows Server 2003 dropping connections"
- In reply to: Phillip Renouf: "RE: Terminal Services question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:44:26 -0400
Agreed. Based on his situation, he'd better take the first level of
improving security over that right away by renaming the administrator
account and setting up a complex password policy.
-- Todd J Heron, MCSE Windows 2003/2000/NT "Phillip Renouf" <PhillipRenouf@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:C246BDC3-EEB5-4AC8-902B-6CCACB60BAD0@microsoft.com... > As I re-read the ominous "you will be hacked" statement that didn't come > across quite right. Opening that hole on your firewall will dramatically > increase the likelyhood of someone hacking your system. > > Phil > > "Phillip Renouf" wrote: > > > The risk of opening the Terminal Server ports on your firewall is that > > essentially anyone can connect via RDP to your server right through your > > firewall. That is an enormous security hole and you will get hacked if you do > > that. > > > > Everyone is hyping up the Citrix solution because most remote access schemes > > involving Citrix are using the Citrix Extranet client and NFuse. That > > combination gives you a secured VPN connection to the NFuse portal which > > allows you to access your Citrix server(s) remotely. Essentially it's like a > > VPN, but it is only for access to Citrix and nothing else. This is a nicely > > secure connection especially if you combine the Extranet client with a > > SecurID authentication. > > > > Citrix offers a lot of other features that Terminal Services doesn't and > > that is really why it is worth the extra money if you are interested in using > > those features. The biggest ones are that Citrix has published applications > > and published desktops. Instead of just having a remote connection to the > > server you can control access to applications on a per application basis and > > can tailor a desktop for various groups of users to allow them to see only > > the applications that they need to use on the server. You can also put an > > icon on someones desktop that will display the application just as if it was > > running right on their desktop even though it is actually running on the > > Citrix server. There are many other features, but I'd be here all day going > > over them. > > > > Phil > > > > "Jeff" wrote: > > > > > I set up the Terminal Services on my Win 2003 server and a > > > few of us access it through VPN and it works GREAT. What > > > is the risk of opening the port on our router to access it > > > from anywhere vs Citrix which was highly recommended by a > > > lot of people. You know this Terminal Server works great > > > and if it's secure enough why not use it instead of paying > > > the extra $$$. > > > > > > Any suggestion I would greatly appreciate. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > >
- Next message: Tom Sawyer: "AD Restore on new Server Installation"
- Previous message: Todd J Heron: "Re: Windows Server 2003 dropping connections"
- In reply to: Phillip Renouf: "RE: Terminal Services question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|