Re: Group Policies
From: Miha Pihler (mihap-news_at_atlantis.si)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Feng Mao: "RE: NTBackup normal backup aborts after single tape"
- Previous message: Dave: "Group Policies"
- In reply to: Dave: "Group Policies"
- Next in thread: Dave: "Re: Group Policies"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: Group Policies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:11:11 +0200
Hi Dave,
I think best thing in this case as your describe (need for different groups
of people and different settings) would be to create different OU
(Organization Units).
E.g. you create one OU named IT department, next OU would be named Users OU
etc. Now you have to define your policy on these OUs (e.g. different
settings for IT department OU, different settings for Users OU... etc). All
users inside e.g. Users OU would have same restrictions.
I hope this helps,
Mike
"Dave" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7ff701c49592$244ebbc0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
> We have a network we need to have strong security on.
>
> The servers all need a set of security restrictions on
> which can all be set in a group policy - only two of 10
> will be domain controllers.
>
> The PCs for users all need a certain range of settings
> set through group policies.
>
> And then the IT system Administators again need ceratin
> settings.
>
> If we set a group of users for the servers to log on with
> in AD, then a seperate group for users and then a third
> for the IT department, each with their own policies -
> would this work?
- Next message: Feng Mao: "RE: NTBackup normal backup aborts after single tape"
- Previous message: Dave: "Group Policies"
- In reply to: Dave: "Group Policies"
- Next in thread: Dave: "Re: Group Policies"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: Group Policies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|