Re: Running Windows 2003 Server on Intel P4 Hyper Threaded Process

From: Jonathan Maltz [MS-MVP] (jmaltz_at_mvps.org)
Date: 08/15/04 

Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:34:02 -0400

It's why I use Virtual PC ;) 

-- 
--Jonathan Maltz [Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - IIS, Virtual PC]
http://www.visualwin.com - A Windows Server 2003 visual, step-by-step
tutorial site :-)
http://vpc.visualwin.com - Does <insert OS name> work on VPC 2004?  Find out
here
Only reply by newsgroup.  I do not do technical support via email.  Any
emails I have not authorized are deleted before I see them.
"dfox@alliedpaperco.com" <dfox@alliedpaperco.com@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message news:30B23B94-F6F9-4195-9960-014D8175B56A@microsoft.com...
> Thanks for the speedy response. Ain't virtual sweet.
>
> "Jonathan Maltz [MS-MVP]" wrote:
>
> > Yes, they can both utilize HT.  As a matter of fact, 2000 has no problem
> > with HT either - except that it sees the virtual processors as real
> > processors, so you'd run into the limit of CPUs with 2 physical chips on
> > 2000 Pro or 4 physical chips on 2000 Server.  XP and 2003 don't have
this
> > problem, and see the virtual processors as just that
> >
> > I think SQL also sees them as virtual so you wouldn't need more
licenses,
> > but I suggest you ask this in a SQL group since I'm honestly not sure
> >
> > -- 
> > --Jonathan Maltz [Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - IIS, Virtual PC]
> > http://www.visualwin.com - A Windows Server 2003 visual, step-by-step
> > tutorial site :-)
> > http://vpc.visualwin.com - Does <insert OS name> work on VPC 2004?  Find
out
> > here
> > Only reply by newsgroup.  I do not do technical support via email.  Any
> > emails I have not authorized are deleted before I see them.
> >
> >
> > "dfox@alliedpaperco.com"
<dfox@alliedpaperco.com@discussions.microsoft.com>
> > wrote in message
news:89E4C6C5-3ACD-4A23-B790-018B1418139A@microsoft.com...
> > > Ok Microsoft and Intel agree Hyper Threading should be disabled when
Win2K
> > > Pro and Server. The question is whether Server 2003 like its XP Pro
> > brother
> > > is blessed with the ability to utlitlize Hyper Threading?
> > >
> > > IF "Yes" THEN "What about SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition running on
the
> > > said Win2k3 Server"
> > >
> > > IF "No" Why the hell not?
> >
> >
> >

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mutliple Websites in same domain space.
    ... I do not do technical support via email. ... >> tutorial site :-) ... >> Only reply by newsgroup. ... >>> Our company has and intranet site that we use to keep track of ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)
  • Re: MSDN Win 2003 and Remote Desktop
    ... I do not do technical support via email. ... >> tutorial site :-) ... >> Only reply by newsgroup. ... >>> Can I run Remote Desktop without buying or having terminal services ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Cant Activate Upgrade of W2K3 (Repost)
    ... I do not do technical support via email. ... "Doug Thews" wrote in message ... >> tutorial site :-) ... >> Only reply by newsgroup. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: How to build a new win2k3 small business server
    ... I do not do technical support via email. ... > Tks, Jonathan ... >> tutorial site :-) ... >> Only reply by newsgroup. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.setup)
  • Re: Small Network Setup
    ... --Jonathan Maltz [Microsoft MVP - Windows Server, ... I do not do technical support via email. ... >> tutorial site :-) ... >> Only reply by newsgroup. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.setup)
Loading