Re: A (maybe) stupid question
From: Dmitry Korolyov [MVP] (d__k_at_removethispart.mail.ru)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: Tired and overworked: "Re: Terminal Services vs. Citrix?"
- Previous message: Miha Pihler: "Re: Terminal Services vs. Citrix?"
- In reply to: Tired and overworked: "A (maybe) stupid question"
- Next in thread: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: A (maybe) stupid question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:45:43 +0400
You're always welcome to answer questions and help the community.
-- Dmitry Korolyov [d__k@removethispart.mail.ru] MVP: Windows Server - Active Directory "Tired and overworked" <spam@me.now> wrote in message news:#OI2d52fEHA.3272@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hello I recently discovered this group. It has been a huge help to me. I've seen some questions asked that I've known the answers (from experience, but mostly tearing my hair out). So, my question is - is it acceptable for me to reply to questions, or is this group moderated by a group of people who are designated as the "resident experts"? Like, the subject says - a stupid question - but I don't want to jump in where it's not acceptable :)
- Next message: Tired and overworked: "Re: Terminal Services vs. Citrix?"
- Previous message: Miha Pihler: "Re: Terminal Services vs. Citrix?"
- In reply to: Tired and overworked: "A (maybe) stupid question"
- Next in thread: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: A (maybe) stupid question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|