Re: Mirrored Volume
From: Ricardo (Ricardo_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: Cat2k1: "Re: Small Business Server 2003 Premium Edition automatically shuts"
- Previous message: Brian Henderson: "Re: EXCHANGE 2003 on a Windows Storage Server 2003"
- In reply to: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Mirrored Volume"
- Next in thread: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Mirrored Volume"
- Reply: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Mirrored Volume"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:03:02 -0700
OK,
but if the first disk fails, will the secound (mirrored) start to work
automaticaly to avoid system downtime ??
If, yes, is it transparent to users ?
Thanks
"Bjorn Landemoo" wrote:
> Ricardo
>
> The reason for creating a mirror is not data safety, but to reduce or
> eliminate downtime in case of a disk failure. To protect your data, a
> backup solution is essential.
>
> On a mirror, your data will not be protected against virus, file system
> corruption, hard disk controller failures that might create corruption or
> accidental deletion.
>
> Best regards
>
> Bjorn
> --
> Bjorn Landemoo - mvp2@landemoo.com - http://landemoo.com/
> Microsoft MVP (Windows Server - File System)
>
> "Ricardo" <Ricardo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >I have a HD with critical informations ina W2K server. Configuring a secound
> >HD as mirrored, will ensure me I can restore the system in case of failure of
> >the first HD ?
>
>
- Next message: Cat2k1: "Re: Small Business Server 2003 Premium Edition automatically shuts"
- Previous message: Brian Henderson: "Re: EXCHANGE 2003 on a Windows Storage Server 2003"
- In reply to: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Mirrored Volume"
- Next in thread: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Mirrored Volume"
- Reply: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Mirrored Volume"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
