Re: Partition Size/performance
From: Mike Brearley (mike_brearleyNOSPAM_at_DONTDOIThotmail.com)
Date: 03/10/04
- Next message: Bruce: "Service Logon Password Corruption"
- Previous message: R.Schreibers: "Unable to remove a service with instsrv.exe"
- In reply to: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Partition Size/performance"
- Next in thread: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Partition Size/performance"
- Reply: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Partition Size/performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:35:45 -0500
I've swapped two drive cages... now to wait and see. As of right now,
everything is still up and running. I'm thinking possibly a SATA cable may
be the issue rather than the promise card or the superswap's, I really don't
know. We'll see. If the same drive goes off, I'll swap the cable and see
what happens after that.
Actually, I need to contact promise as well. When a drive goes offline,
it's reported as Free in the BIOS level raid utility, but in the Windows
version (PAM) it's shown as offline and I can't do a thing with it (even
after a reboot). This is a problem because it makes the idea of hot swap go
right out the window. I'm forced to go into the BIOS utility, create a JBOD
array with that single disk, boot into windows, start up the promise array
management software (pam), delete the new jbod array and then I can re-build
the raid-5 array with the now online disk. What a PAIN!! lol
-- Posted 'as is'. If there are any spelling and/or grammar mistakes, they were a direct result of my fingers and brain not being synchronized or my lack of caffeine. Mike Brearley "Bjorn Landemoo" <mvp2.REMOVE@landemoo.com> wrote in message news:o26s40dv4m7b0gvb1bcptsdmoh8bl5pute@4ax.com... > Mike > > If there, for instance, is something wrong with the SATA contact in the > drive cage, it might still be reported as on line by the drive cage, while > the controller might have another opinion... This would explain your > performance issue. > > Swapping drive cage will reveal if it is at fault, next time a disk goes > off. Probably it will be the disk that you swapped into this same drive > cage. > > Best regards > > Bjorn > -- > Bjorn Landemoo - mvp2@landemoo.com - http://landemoo.com/ > Microsoft MVP - Windows Server Networking > > "Mike Brearley" <mike_brearleyNOSPAM@DONTDOIThotmail.com> wrote: > > >Strangely enough, no. I guess saying that it goes offline isn't quite the > >right way to put it. The monitoring for it is unavailable and the > >controller card states that it's offline, however the lights on it are still > >active and show it as online. > > > >Everything was working for about 3 days until last night around 1 am I > >received an e-mail from the management utility stating the drive went > >offline. I have yet to swap everything around as promise wanted me to > >because I haven't had the time. I'm preparing for it now and will probably > >try it tonight or tomorrow. > > > >-- > >Posted 'as is'. If there are any spelling and/or grammar mistakes, they > >were a direct result of my fingers and brain not being synchronized or my > >lack of caffeine. > > > >Mike Brearley > > > > > >"Bjorn Landemoo" <mvp2.REMOVE@landemoo.com> wrote in message > >news:6erh401nbvm74sgteinlq7l9dlrc4c5l29@4ax.com... > >> Mike > >> > >> Doesn't the controller lose contact with a hard drive when the enclosure > >> goes offline, practically meaning that the disk also goes offline? > >> > >> Sorry for all my questions, my experience is with SCSI RAID with a > >> backplane, or with software RAID. I haven't had the opportunity to play > >> with IDE or SATA RAID, yet. By the way, 3ware seems to have nice > >backplanes > >> for four SATA drives that will fit in two 5½" slots. > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> Bjorn > >> -- > >> Bjorn Landemoo - mvp2@landemoo.com - http://landemoo.com/ > >> Microsoft MVP - Windows Server Networking > >> > >> "Mike Brearley" <mike_brearleyNOSPAM@DONTDOIThotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >There is monitoring available and it tells me when a disk goes offline, > >but > >> >not when a drive enclosure goes offline. I called promise and now I need > >to > >> >swap two drive cages around (the one that's going offline with another > >one). > >> >So that means I have to move the physical units around as the cables > >Promise > >> >gives you to daisy chain the enclosures together for the monitoring is > >just > >> >long enough to go from one unit on top to the unit directly beneath it. > >> >Otherwise, I could have just moved the sata cable and re-arranged how one > >> >enclosure was linked to the other. :( > >> > > >> >I'll do that over the weekend and see what happens... > >> > > >
- Next message: Bruce: "Service Logon Password Corruption"
- Previous message: R.Schreibers: "Unable to remove a service with instsrv.exe"
- In reply to: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Partition Size/performance"
- Next in thread: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Partition Size/performance"
- Reply: Bjorn Landemoo: "Re: Partition Size/performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|