Terminal Services 2003 vs Citrix MetaFrame

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Thomas Holme Larsen (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/27/04 

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:51:06 -0800

Hi Everybody.

Can someone please help me with the differences between Terminal Services 2003 and Citrix MetaFrame.

We plan to buy one of these products, but we like to know the differences between the products.

The Citrix MetaFrame Is very expensive, so we like to know if we get value for our money with the Citrix solution or we are better off with the Terminal Server 2003.

All computers connecting to the solution will be Windows XP.
All Clients have broadband Internet connection.

Thanks in advance.

Thomas Holme Larsen

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Move MultiUser Access Database onto Terminal Services
    ... I am running an Access Front-End using ODBC-linked SQLServer Tables as well ... as Jet-linked Tables using Citrix MetaFrame with more than 50 users but ... Access Database over terminal services? ... > Systems Developer ...
    (microsoft.public.access.conversion)
  • CITRIX & Microsoft Windows Terminal Services False IP Address Vulnerability
    ... CITRIX & Microsoft Windows Terminal Services False IP Address Vulnerability ... Like MS Terminal Services, CITRIX Metaframe 1.8 (and other versions, I ... Segurança da Informação ...
    (Bugtraq)
  • Re: Citix MetaFrame
    ... > Does anyone know of any cheaper packages that Citrix Metaframe that will ... Will a MS Terminal services compatible client be acceptable? ... Charles LaCour ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Windows Messenger 5.1 and Terminal Services
    ... and Citrix Metaframe). ... but application sharing is not enabled for the ... Is this feature supported with Terminal Services? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.messenger)