Re: local group management by Power Users: is there ownership?
From: myself (tired.of.spam)
Date: 02/18/04
- Next message: Kristofer Gafvert: "Re: 2003 POP3 Mail Server Issue"
- Previous message: Tessa Thompson: "Delegating right to unlock user accounts in 2003"
- In reply to: david.burghgraeve_at_dolmen.be: "local group management by Power Users: is there ownership?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:09:11 +0100
Why not grant r/w permission to the parent directory to a group that both
users have in common? Such permissions will be inherited for every
file/folder they will create.
-- Check out NeoExec ! [ www.neovalens.com ] -- "david.burghgraeve@dolmen.be" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:11cea01c3f646$84a0f330$a101280a@phx.gbl... > Hi there, > I have a question about ownership of local groups on > windows2003 servers. I have a situation here and It seems > there's not a lot of info about this on the net. Two > different users, each one a member of "power users" on a > fileserver, manage the local groups. If userA creates a > local group on the file server, user B can't modify that > group. > > So, there's an ownership involved here... > > How kan I change the default owneship behaviour? Or is > there a way that I can setup a right that the two power > users can also manage each-others created groups... > > Making them Administrators is not acceptable. They are > power users for that reason in the first place!
- Next message: Kristofer Gafvert: "Re: 2003 POP3 Mail Server Issue"
- Previous message: Tessa Thompson: "Delegating right to unlock user accounts in 2003"
- In reply to: david.burghgraeve_at_dolmen.be: "local group management by Power Users: is there ownership?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
