RE: Fowarder failover
- From: BenP <BenP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:40:00 -0800
Thanks for response, but... doesn't answer my question. I have forward only
configuration so no root queries.
What I have found is the default forwarder query timeout - 5 seconds - is
still suitable and provides working failover. This is due to client side
interaction, even if client side query - generally 2 seconds - times out
first pass the forwarder list failover will still operate and bring back
successful answer, the second client pass will then have answer.
I have a datacentres infrastructure plus want to populate forwarders list
via GPO. Just want to know if I can get 4 working forwarders; two per
datacentre, or have to use 3 before setting up my policies.
"oz.ozugurlu" wrote:
You have very interesting question, as general having two forwarders should.
be enough and I would enable “the root hints option beside forwarders if the
forwarders won't response the queries” in case.
Assuming your servers do have internet connectivity , ISP DNS servers are
down or not answering the recursive queries as well as root hint server, Then
I would say nothing to worry about because the entire internet will be down
(-:, you can safely ignore anything in regards to external connectivity
--oz
--
Oz Ozugurlu
MVP (Exchange)
MCITP (EMA), MCITP (EA),MCITP (SA)
MCSE 2003, M+, S+, MCDST
Security+, Project +, Server +
oz@xxxxxxxxxx
http://smtp25.blogspot.com (Blog)
"BenP" wrote:
I can't seem to find any information from MS about how many servers in a
forwarder list will be tried before queries are failed.
In O'Reilly DNS on Windows Server 2003 it says 6 servers can be configured.
There is no limit on how many servers can actually be entered in the list.
However when I have tested failing over DNS Server only seems to attempt the
first 3 forwarders in the list (netmon trace).
Is this a configurable parameter (registry) or fixed limitation?
Thnx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fowarder failover
- From: Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
- Re: Fowarder failover
- References:
- Fowarder failover
- From: BenP
- RE: Fowarder failover
- From: oz.ozugurlu
- Fowarder failover
- Prev by Date: RE: Set up a web server question
- Next by Date: Split Zone Internal / External?
- Previous by thread: RE: Fowarder failover
- Next by thread: Re: Fowarder failover
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|