Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <firstnamelastname@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 23:31:05 -0500
In news:979f1b0d-d772-4db6-b149-36cf2d8cb1dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mygposts@xxxxxxxxx <mygposts@xxxxxxxxx> requesting assistance, typed the following:
Also, the two nics are on different subnets. I read somewhere that
using two nics on a dc is only a problem when both nics are on the
same subnet.
Actually if on the same subnet, you can team them. But if on different subnets, and one is NOT reachable by clients, yet the registration exists in DNS and will more than likely be given to a client in a query response, then YES it WILL be problematic.
I explained what the problems that can occur in that link. I'll post it here for your convenience. It talks about using the DC as a NAT device because that is the common reason many multihome a DC, but the same thing occurs due to the mutliple NICs and different subnets they are on. Please read throught it. I will be glad to respond to any specific questions you may have.
- Ace
=======================
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
With all due respect, multi-homed DCs are not recommended because of the associated issues that WILL occur with AD. If using a DC as an internet
access gateway, I recommend purchasing an inexpensive Linksys, DLink, etc, Cable/DSL router to perform NAT for you, take out the extra NIC off the DC, but still let the DC handle DHCP (and not the router).
If used for some other reason, I would highly recommend removing the NICs and apps and use a non-DC for the task.
Little background on AD and DNS:
First, just to get this out of the way, if you have your ISP's DNS addresses in your IP configuration (DCs and clients), they need to be REMOVED. If the ISP's DNS is in there, this will cause additional problems. I usually see errors (GPOs not working, can't find the domain, RPC issues, etc), when the ISP's DNS servers are listed on a client, DCs and/or member servers, or with multihomed DCs. If you have an ISP's (or some other outside DNS server or even using your router as a DNS server) DNS addresses in your IP configuration (all DCs, member servers and clients), they need to be REMOVED and ONLY use the internal DNS server(s). This can be very problematic.
More background: AD uses DNS. DNS stores AD's resource and service locations in the form of SRV records, hence how everything that is part of the domain will find resources in the domain. If the ISP's DNS is configured in the any of the internal AD member machines' IP properties, (including all client machines and DCs), the machines will be asking the ISP's DNS 'where is the domain controller for my domain?", whenever it needs to perform a function, (such as a logon request, replication request, querying and applying GPOs, etc). Unfortunately, the ISP's DNS does not have that info and they reply with an "I dunno know", and things just fail. Unfortunately, the ISP's (or your router as a DNS server) DNS
doesn't have information or records about your internal private AD domain, and they shouldn't have that sort of information.
Also, AD registers certain records in DNS in the form of SRV records that signify AD's resource and service locations. When there are multiple NICs, each NIC registers. IF a client, or another DC queries DNS for this DC, it may get the wrong record. One factor controlling this is Round Robin. If a DC or client on another subnet that the DC is not configured on queries for it, Round Robin will kick in offering one or the other.
If the wrong one gets offered, it may not have a route to it. On the other hand, Subnetmask Priortization will ensure a querying client will get an IP that corresponds to the subnet it's on, which will work. To insure everything works, stick with one NIC.
Since this DC is multi-homed, it requires additional configuration to prevent the public interface addresses from being registered in DNS. This creates a problem for internal clients locating AD to authenticate and find other services and resources such as the Global Catalog, file sharing and the SYSVOL DFS share and can cause GPO errors with Userenv 1000 events to be logged, authenticating to shares and printers, logging on takes forever, among numerous other issues.
But if you like, there are some registry changes to eliminate the registration of the external NIC or simply use the internal networking routing to allow access. Here's the whole list of manual steps to follow.
Another problem is the DC now becomes part of two Sites. This is another issue that can be problematic.
But believe me, it's much easier to just get a separate NAT device or multihome a non-DC then having to alter the DC. If the both NICs are internal, I would suggest to pick a subnet, team the NICs and allow your internal routers handle the traffic between subnets - Good luck!
1. Insure that all the NICS only point to your internal DNS server(s) only and none others, such as your ISP's DNS servers' IP addresses.
2. In Network & Dialup properties, Advanced Menu item, Advanced Settings, move the internal NIC (the network that AD is on) to the top of the binding order (top of the list).
3. Disable the ability for the outer NIC to register. The procedure, as mentioned, involves identifying the outer NIC's GUID number. This link will show you how:
246804 - How to Enable-Disable Windows 2000 Dynamic DNS Registrations (per NIC too):
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804
4. Disable NetBIOS on the outside NIC. That is performed by choosing to disable NetBIOS in IP Properties, Advanced, and you will find that under the "WINS" tab. You may want to look at step #3 in the article to show you how to disable NetBIOS on the RRAS interfaces if this is a RRAS server.
296379 - How to Disable NetBIOS on an Incoming Remote Access Interface [Registry Entry]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=296379
Note: A standard Windows service, called the "Browser service", provides the list of machines, workgroup and domain names that you see in "My
Network Places" (or the legacy term "Network Neighborhood"). The Browser service relies on the NetBIOS service. One major requirement of NetBIOS service is a machine can only have one name to one IP address. It's sort of a fingerprint. You can't have two brothers named Darrell. A multihomed machine will cause duplicate name errors on itself because Windows sees itself with the same name in the Browse List (My Network Places), but with different IPs. You can only have one, hence the error generated.
5. Disable the "File and Print Service" and disable the "MS Client Service" on the outer NIC. That is done in NIC properties by unchecking the respective service under the general properties page. If you need these services on the outside NIC (which is unlikely), which allow other machines to connect to your machine for accessing resource on your machine (shared folders, printers, etc.), then you will probably need to keep them enabled.
6. Uncheck "Register this connection" under IP properties, Advanced settings, "DNS" tab.
7. Delete the outer NIC IP address, disable Netlogon registration, and manually create the required records
a. In DNS under the zone name, (your DNS domain name), delete the outer NIC's IP references for the "LdapIpAddress". If this is a GC, you will need to delete the GC IP record as well (the "GcIpAddress"). To do that, in the DNS console, under the zone name, you will see the _msdcs folder.
Under that, you will see the _gc folder. To the right, you will see the IP address referencing the GC address. That is called the GcIpAddress.
Delete the IP addresses referencing the outer NIC.
i. To stop these two records from registering that information, use the steps provided in the links below:
Private Network Interfaces on a Domain Controller Are Registered in DNS
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328
ii. The one section of the article that disables these records is done with this registry entry:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters
(Create this Multi-String Value under it):
Registry value: DnsAvoidRegisterRecords
Data type: REG_MULTI_SZ
Values: LdapIpAddress
GcIpAddress
iii. Here is more information on these and other Netlogon Service records:
Restrict the DNS SRV resource records updated by the Netlogon service [including GC]:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/proddocs/standard/sag_dns_pro_no_rr_in_ad.asp
b. Then you will need to manually create these two records in DNS with the IP addresses that you need for the DC. To create the LdapIpAddress, create a new host under the domain, but leave the "hostname" field blank, and provide the internal IP of the DC, which results in a record that looks like:
(same as parent) A 192.168.5.200 (192.168.5.200 is used for illustrative purposes)
i. You need to also manually create the GcIpAddress as well, if this is a GC. That would be under the _msdcs._gc SRV record under the zone. It is created in the same fashion as the LdapIpAddress mentioned above.
8. In the DNS console, right click the server name, choose properties, then under the "Interfaces" tab, force it only to listen to the internal NIC's IP address, and not the IP address of the outer NIC.
9. Since this is also a DNS server, the IPs from all NICs will register, even if you tell it not to in the NIC properties. See this to show you how to stop that behavior (this procedure is for Windows 2000, but will also work for Windows 2003):
275554 - The Host's A Record Is Registered in DNS After You Choose Not to Register the Connection's Address:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=275554
10. If you haven't done so, configure a forwarder. You can use 4.2.2.2 if not sure which DNS to forward to until you've got the DNS address of your ISP.
How to set a forwarder? Good question. Depending on your operating system,choose one of the following articles:
300202 - HOW TO: Configure DNS for Internet Access in Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=300202&FR=1
323380 - HOW TO: Configure DNS for Internet Access in Windows Server 2003 (How to configure a forwarder):
http://support.microsoft.com/d/id?=323380
Active Directory communication fails on multihomed domain controllers
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272294
<==*** Some additional reading ***==>
More links to read up and understand what is going on:
292822 - Name Resolution and Connectivity Issues on Windows 2000 Domain Controller with Routing and Remote Access and DNS Insta {DNS and RRAS and unwanted IPs registering]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=292822
Active Directory communication fails on multihomed domain controllers
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272294
246804 - How to enable or disable DNS updates in Windows 2000 and in Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804
295328 - Private Network Interfaces on a Domain Controller Are Registered in DNS [also shows DnsAvoidRegisterRecords LdapIpAddress to avoid reg sameasparent private IP]: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328
306602 - How to Optimize the Location of a DC or GC That Resides Outside of a Client's Site [Includes info LdapIpAddress and GcIpAddress
information and the SRV mnemonic values]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=306602
825036 - Best practices for DNS client settings in Windows 2000 Server and in Windows Server 2003 (including how-to configure a forwarder):
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;825036
291382 - Frequently asked questions about Windows 2000 DNS and Windows Server 2003 DNS
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=291382
296379 - How to Disable NetBIOS on an Incoming Remote Access Interface [Registry Entry]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=296379
Rid Pool Errors and other mutlhomed DC errors, and how to configure a multihomed DC, Ace Fekay, 24
Feb 2006
http://www.ureader.com/message/3244572.aspx
_________________________
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ace
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: MyGposts
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- References:
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: mygposts
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: mygposts
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- From: mygposts
- Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- Prev by Date: Re: Split DNS and HTTPS
- Next by Date: Re: workstation DNS
- Previous by thread: Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- Next by thread: Re: Machines not being registered in DNS anymore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading