Re: PTR Records
- From: "Herb Martin" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:07:35 -0800
"MC" <mc@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u%23aIFTO9FHA.1028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I ran some Reverse DNS Lookups for our domain and have a problem that I'm
> not sure how to solve. We have a filter that receives all incoming email
> (so
> the MX record is set to the filter's IP), but each Exchange 2000 server
> sends its own outgoing email. We do have PTR records for all of the
> Exchange
> servers, but they are not listed first, so the domains that check PTR
> records are refusing email from us because our PTR records don't point
> back
> to the original IP.
"Not listed first"?? What specifically does this mean in this case?
Your reverse records must be in a publicly accessible, properly
delegated reverse zone (likely at your ISP) if you wish everyone
to accept your outgoing email.
The value returned (the name) should also be an A-Host record
with the same Name to Address mapping.
This is not (precisely) an RFC but it is enforced by some email
servers.
> If one of you kind souls has a few minutes to help with
> this, please send me an email and I will provide the IPs that have the
> problem! Thanks!
>
Try www.DNSReport.com to assist you in troubleshooting this.
And/or give us the domain name so we can also check.
--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PTR Records
- From: MC
- Re: PTR Records
- References:
- PTR Records
- From: MC
- PTR Records
- Prev by Date: PTR Records
- Next by Date: Re: PTR Records
- Previous by thread: PTR Records
- Next by thread: Re: PTR Records
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|