Re: RRAS added an additional IP/Host to itself to make the server mutilthomed...
- From: "PinkCrib" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:31:19 -0500
Thanks Deji,
I've looks at the article. If I go for the "workaround" solution to assign a
different subnet on static IP pool, what else do I need to allow diffent
subnets to communicate? Thanks
"Deji Akomolafe" <noemail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uiL2KExrFHA.3836@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Known issue. Search through the archives. Try
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;292822
>
> --
>
> Sincerely,
> Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
> Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> www.readymaids.com - we know IT
> www.akomolafe.com
> Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
> Yesterday? -anon
> "PinkCrib" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23GOmnBxrFHA.2348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hi All,
> > We have a 2000 DC (192.168.100.100) with RRAS configured. I've assigned
a
> > static address pool 192.168.100.10 ~ 20 to allow our mobile users to
dial
> > in.
> > Since then, when I ping the DC, I get 192.168.100.10 replies instead of
> > 192.168.100.100. It seems like the RRAS acqures an additional IP for its
> > internal interface, and also register a record in DNS. We're still be
able
> > to access network resources and the Internet, but I feel I missed
> > something
> > here.
> >
> > Please advice! Thanks
> >
> > calvin
> >
> >
>
>
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Seeing Clients between VPN Routers
- Next by Date: Intermittent Internet Loss with SBS 2003 SP1
- Previous by thread: Re: RRAS added an additional IP/Host to itself to make the server mutilthomed...
- Next by thread: ForestDNSZones
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|