Dynamic Update of A&PTR Records - Best Practice?
- From: "Richard Tubb" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:23:22 +0100
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice on the pros/cons of turning on the option within
the DHCP Server that says "Always Dynamically Update A & PTR Records".
We run a Windows 2003 AD network with a DC running DHCP and DNS. On the
workstation we have Windows XP Professional.
I understand that Windows XP clients, by default, automatically update their
DNS A record when renewing IP address allocations from DHCP, but not PTR
records.
Is there any reason why you would not turn on this option, so that PTR
records are kept upto date without manual intervention?
I'm interested to understand the reasoning behind turning on/off this
option - whether it's a case of needing it when you use legacy clients that
don't automatically update records in DNS, or some other valid reason.
Thanks for any assistance offered!
Regards,
Richard Tubb.
www.netlinktrading.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dynamic Update of A&PTR Records - Best Practice?
- From: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
- RE: Dynamic Update of A&PTR Records - Best Practice?
- From: Ken Zhao [MSFT]
- Re: Dynamic Update of A&PTR Records - Best Practice?
- Prev by Date: Re: Client DNS Registration Problem
- Next by Date: Re: REVERSE DNS Failing
- Previous by thread: Child domain not appearing in Network Neighborhood
- Next by thread: RE: Dynamic Update of A&PTR Records - Best Practice?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|