Re: Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- From: "Derek" <dg364@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:06:00 -0700
Steve,
Thanks for the response and detailed information, helped a lot.
Derek
"Steve Duff [MVP]" <ergodic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u2CvnUPjFHA.3300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> While it is possible and not I believe technically invalid to define
> multiple PTR records for a single IP, it can cause problems when used on a
> public DNS, and it would be pointless besides simply because applications
> will only use the first one returned in the response.
>
> Standard mail system reverse DNS checks are happy if they see >any< public
> reverse name for the sender's IP. I've seen a couple that try to skim out
> the "junk" rDNS names assigned by default by larger ISPs. It is also
> possible for the receiver to do a 'round-trip' on the rDNS name to verify
> the original IP matches one in that response, or that there is a matching
> public MX for the domain. All these types of checks should pass for a
> public mail server, and are easy to verify with nslookup or at a testing
> website.
>
> But if the receiving mail server is insisting that the reverse lookup map
> directly to the sender's domain (and isn't doing any alternative checks
> such as SPF, MX, etc.) then it is being way too aggressive. Virtual
> domains on overloaded IPs are quite common and I can pretty much guarantee
> that such a mail server is tagging or dropping a lot of valid mail.
>
> Steve Duff, MCSE, MVP
> Ergodic Systems, Inc.
>
> "Derek" <dg364@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OvqfuCOjFHA.2644@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been racking my brains on this one. I have multiple websites
>> hosted on a DC with integrated DNS (2K3). Everything on the domains
>> works fine, the DNS is set and the websites are all running perfectly.
>> However, when one of them recently sent Email it was rejected due to an
>> inability to perform a reverse lookup on the IP. When doing a reverse on
>> the IP which all of the sites are hosted on only one the domain names
>> comes up. How can I get DNS to respond with all of them to avoid this
>> problem?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Derek
>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- From: Derek
- Re: Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- From: Steve Duff [MVP]
- Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- Prev by Date: Re: Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- Next by Date: Re: Windows XP Client auto logon to local machine
- Previous by thread: Re: Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- Next by thread: Re: Reverse DNS with Multiple Virtual Hosts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|